Talk:José Rizal/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rizal's Exile Shrine, Dapitan

These are the only Photos with informtion I can find..

http://www.batch2006.com/visit_rizal-shrine-dapitan.htm Photos and information on Rizal's Exile Shrine, Dapitan

As per guidelines.. no personal promotions, only true and actual information with no advertising. Ateamfog (talk) 22:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Some suggestions

I noticed the article is a bit cluttered and the organization is clunky. Facts are haphazardly thrown in and there is no clear timeline. There are various poorly-constructed and lengthy sentences like

However, contentious litigation followed the friars' attempts to raise tenant rental fees which the farmers, led by Rizal, disputed while exposing the non-payment of taxes due on friar land taken over by the Dominicans from the Jesuits after their expulsion. (under "Education")

and

This period of his education and his frenetic pursuit of life, including his recorded affections--Gertrude Becket of Chalcot Crescent, wealthy and high-minded Nelly Boustead of the English and Iberian merchant family, the idyllic romance with Usui Seiko--'The last descendant of a noble family, true to an unfortunate vengeance, you are beautiful..,'and his earlier friendships with Segunda Katigbak and his cousin, Leonor Rivera--have kindled abiding interest in his story. ("Writings")

Also I suggest limiting our adjectives guys, given that stories involving Rizal tend to be notoriously arguable. The least we can do is to make the article sound journalistic. Sentences like

The intended consequence of teaching the natives where they stood brought about the obverse reaction, as the Philippine Revolution of 1896 took off virulently thereafter. ("Writings")

could be improved by omitting words. No one likes to consult a dictionary every two sentences because of unnecessarily uncommon adjectives/adverbs (obverse is not even an adjective —- the poster meant adverse —- and this is exactly the point). Some sections sound like they're right off a soap opera; see for example the section "Persecutions". I think the anecdotes or stories in the article are best laid out as quotes from a credible source —- a published book, possibly, and not a website. Maybe we can append "it is claimed that" when citing webpage references?

Also, I think the appearance of phrases like "It seems" and "thus" and "can be said" do nothing but diminish the credibility of this article. I haven't even finished the article yet, but these flaws just jumped out at me as i was reading thru it. ……210.4.12.17 05:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree. The article needs to be cleaned up and shortened/made concise. Shrumster 19:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

    • obverse - adjective: figurative - being a counterpart to something else. --World Book Dictionary

to 210.4.12.17

You are welcome to make editions to improve the article. You complain that the article is a "bit cluttered" and "clunky", therefore I wish you could make contributions to make it less so. Remember wikipedia is a colloboration of several editors so some sentences might be haphazardly thrown in by any one who wishes to do so. Some months back someone complained that it sounded like it came from a high-school textbook. Now that editors tried to improve the language of the article, we still have complaints. I don't think those adverbs/adjectives are "unnecessarily uncommon", as you put it. Those words are very commonly used by college students. If one wishes to read it in simple English, there's a simple English Wikepedia on Rizal. I agree that the timeline is a bit out of whack. The paragraph "Legacy" should come at the end, perhaps before the par "Controvresy". Anyone who wishes to help re-arrange this, is welcome.KaElin 19:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Jose Rizal in simple English

Here's the link to the simple English version on Jose Rizal: [1]. KaElin 19:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Nomination for Featured Article

I think the article is very well written (mostly contributions by Umbriago), and covers most aspect of his life. I don't know what else you need, guys. We should go ahead and nominate it for FA (Featured Article). It's better than most bios i've read about Rizal. KaElin 07:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)9/26/02 

         --Not so. I totally agree with Johnyang2, there should be a section dedicated to the 
         lovers in Rizal's life as most of his more famous writings were either dedicated to or 
         were inspired by them. And why is the section on his writings that small? I think it is a 
         mistake to simply summarize this section as it is through his pen that Rizal was able to 
         change the course of the lives of everyone around him, and everyone who has read and truly 
         understood his writings. Sandra5482 07:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

more famous writings

  • His education
  • His works and achievements
  • Controversy of his retraction papers
  • A bit more detail about his arrest and trail
  • Stuff that will make him more human

(",)Mang Kiko 07:55, 7 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Nice. I'd be happy to help but I'm a bit lazy to go through my PI 100 (Rizaliana) notes. :) --seav 08:37, Nov 7, 2003 (UTC)
Darn! And I thought you'll do all the work. :). I'd appreciate some help from everyone. (",)Mang Kiko 23:10, 7 Nov 2003 (UTC)

The story of Rizal's language proficiency is most likely apopcryphal...the most common figure is twenty-two, but I've heard figures up to fifty! Like many national heroes, Rizal has been so shrouded in myth and embellishment that it's difficult to separate fact from fiction. Biographies about Rizal coming out the Philippines are the most suspect, as most authors there seek to glorify him.

It seems that he is not proficient in Cebuano. In his footnote in de Morga's discussion on the Pintados' plundering habits in de las Islas Filipinas he says:
[303] Gûbat, grove, field, in Tagál. Mangubat (so printed in the text of Rizal's edition) signifies in Tagál "to go hunting, or to the wood," or even "to fight."--Rizal. [2]
If he had known Cebuano, or any other language of the Bisaya, I think he would have commented that "gubat" means war, or "guba" means destroyed, or "manguba" means to destroy, or to plunder, as Antonio de Morga says... Happy Rizal day!--Nino Gonzales 06:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

I would suggest any "historians" contributing to this article place themselves under a more rigourous standard of establishing facts, rather than perpetuating urban legends of "St. Rizal." Given all the hagiographies surrounding this legendary figure, that is no small feat.

Good luck. 

--HunanLaoWai

--- I reverted older brother to youger brother as the edit was made by an anon contributor whose IP address has been used for numerous misleading edits in recent months. Please verify. adamsan 12:26, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Ambeth Ocampo

I removed the following line from the end of the article, which had been inserted there by 203.177.18.204:

Rizal Historian Ambeth Ocampo

I'm not sure what was meant by inserting the line, but it seemed to be in the wrong place. If you inserted there, let's figure out what we're doing with it. :) --Jtalledo (talk) 01:48, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)


TRANSLATION INTO SPANISH

Anybody who Habla Espanyol out there? How do you translate Bachelor of Arts ? Babelfish.altavista translates as soltero de artes. ...I'm trying to translate the article.--Jondel 02:10, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"Bachillerato"? I put baccalaureate through an English-Spanish dictionary. → (AllanBz ✎) 04:34, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
Right now at the interwiki link it's 'Bachiller en Artes' . --Jondel 04:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
I know the abbreviation is A.B> at the time of rizal, so it may be Artes Bachiller. Justox dizaola 06:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Expansion

Please specify what areas to expand. Do we assume the themes in Work in progress in the section above(eg:Stuff that will make him more human , etc.. )?--Jondel 00:39, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Hmm...what about his loveydudes? Y'know, Segunda Katigbak, Leonor Rivera, Josephine Bracken...it might sound like gossip but it's still a point of interest. Whoever might be interested to write about it has to be careful not to sound too gossip-columnist-like, though. Dunong 18:17, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

The Birth of A HERO

Near midnight of Wednesday, June 19, 1861, when the Philippines was in deep slumber, a frail baby-boy was born to the Rizal family in Calamba, Laguna. It was moonlit night, being "a few days before the full of the moon." The delivery was exceedingly difficult, and the mother almost died. Her seemingly miraculous survival was attributed to Our Lady of Peace and Good Voyage. Years later Jose Rizal recorded in his boyhood memoirs: "It was a Wednesday, and my arrival in this valley of tears would have cost my mother her life had she not vowed to the Virgin of Antipolo that she would take me on a pilgrimage to that Shrine."

Pride of the Malay Race????, It should be called "Pride of the Filipino People"

To: AllanBz! and to all the anonomous contributers out there. How's it going!:). José Rizal, is a Filipino and it should be called "Pride of the Filipino People".:) The term "Malay" is very "mis-leading" because that term this days, is used to identify the peoples of Malyasia. cool!Thanx!:) -Gonzalo (UTC), 5:30 p.m. 1 August, 2005

While I don't see why Rizal can't be called both, Roman Ozaeta's translation of Palma's biography of Rizal was entitled Pride of the Malay Race, and as such is the common usage. Plus, "Malay" is more general. Plus, there really is no precedent in the real world for calling him that, so it's unencyclopedic. I have seen him called "The First Filipino," but I don't remember where. → ( AllanBz ✎ ) 03:32, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

If "Palma" said so, So be it!:), I like the Native name of the malay race!, it's cool!:) - Gonzalo(UTC) 2:30 p.m., 2 August 2005

Malaysians study Rizal and they consider Filipinos as their cousins of sorts. Malaysian leaders have idealized Rizal such that he is considered a role model for defying the West. Any learned Malaysian would be aware of Rizal's legacy - 7258 04:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I heard the same thing from a Malaysian. They are very conscious of ASEAN/Malay identity. It is a pity that they know about Rizal but us Filipinos, in general, don't know of Dr. Mahathir of Malaysia or Suharto of Indonesia.--Jondel 11:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

I may be wrong, but the title "Pride of the Malay Race" was given to Rizal. It's an appellation, which was accorded during a time when Filipinos were very conscious of their having some Malay descent (Of course, Rizal's a Chinese mestizo...). Blame it on whoever gave the appellation. WikiPedia, however, will have to accept. Rmcsamson 12:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Since these appelations were coined by some historians and writers, I have a proposal: how about a separate (sub-)section for the appelations given to Jose Rizal? That way, we can identify which writer gave which appelation and, if necessary, place appropriate notes or disclaimers about these appelations. What do you think? Tito Pao 19:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Jose Rizal's Profile

Jose Rizal is one of the best heroes in the Philippines. We even celebrate a day devoted to him personally. Jose is a polyglot. Which means a person who can talk 4 different foreign languages. In Rizal's case, he mastered 22-25 foreign languages. Rizal studied in Ateneo. When he was murdered, the whole Philippines was devastated. Jose is thought to have never realized that he would be still be killed even though he spent all his life helping our country, but he also realized that he would do this for our own good....

He knew this from the very beginning. He is not more navie than his friends and family. They know that he will be killed by the friars if he knew too much. He also knew that he will be killed obviously because he was imprisoned a number of times. Thereby, giving him time to conclude that by making a novel that express your ideas that may be wrongly accused to be religious error/blasphemy and revolution. He was warning the people. He was writing about events that if taken place will have a disastrous effect. That is why he did not like the idea of revolt the Katipunan insisted to do.

So, what are you trying to say, eh?

Rizal's execution picture

I've heard that picture is pretty controversial. Any ideas?Circa 1900 15:20, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Controversial meaning that it's debatable as to whether or not the picture is real or because it's controversial material pictured? If it's just the nature of the material, then it it still belongs in Wikipedia, since Wikipedia isn't censored. --Jtalledo (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
About the picture as real, perhaps it deserves a section of its own. Circa 1900 13:05, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Ambeth Ocampo Again

Anyone here who has read some of Ambeth Ocampo's investigations of Rizal's life. I forgot the title of which he (Ocampo) wrote, but some of the things in his work are controversial, if not interesting. Most of the articles in that certain book discusses Rizal's fallibility, gullibility and his more human side; it even has controversies and some minute but interesting details about Rizal's life. I do not have the book with me, but I have some of the articles and I was thinking whether these rumors and interesting articles have some space here in wikipedia. One article there discusses the manuscript of his unfinished work Makamisa, and, well I think it is a tad important. I'd be glad to help write them down.

Not very many Filipinos know a lot about Rizal. --Windspinner 09:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Ambeth Ocampo may be a controversial figure, but I think his work is well-researched and credible. I have the book Rizal Without the Overcoat, and yes, there are lots of material that could be useful in there. But some historians think Ocampo's popularization of history emphasized trivialities.

This page really needs editing, guys! So far, the facts sound like they came from one source, and the article looks like highschool textbook material. We need more depth, more insight! I think our National Hero deserves more than this. Dunong 18:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

FYI: The books are titled Rizal Without the Overcoat and Makamisa: In Search of a Novel. I have Overcoat in my personal library (and read it about ten times), while I borrowed Makamisa from my cousin's collection. The novel Makamisa was mentioned in Overcoat, but subsequent research prompted Mr. Ocampo to write a separate book.
About the writer...not that I totally agree with Ambeth Ocampo (in particular, with some of his opinions), but it helps to know that he has had access to archives and libraries in the Philippines and in Europe (especially in Spain). Many people doubt the veracity of his article collections in Overcoat, but Ambeth Ocampo includes a bilbiography at the book's end; it includes the standard Rizaliana and a lot more references. He has also viewed the original manuscript for the Noli Me Tangere and the El Filibusterismo (which are stored at the vaults of the National Library and, for security reasons, cannot be accessed without the permission of the National Library's director); so if Ocampo, say, made some references to particular erasures in the manuscript, he know what he's saying. Some people think Ambeth Ocampo is inventing some tsismis about Rizal when, in fact, he based these on primary resources.
Also, Makamisa won an award for it's unprecedented scholarly research---in particular, in his painstaking reconstruction of the unfinished novel, which is peppered with annotations. (If my memory serves me correctly, the award was the National Book Critics Award, and it was awarded in 1997 or 1998 [I might need to borrow my cousin's copy again]]). --- Tito Pao 19:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

I think Umbriago made a huge contribution to the article. His edits and additional remarks made the article one of the best so far. KaElin 06:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Featured Article collaboration

Ok, this is exciting! How do we start? :D Would it help to get input (via email) from arch-enemies Ambeth Ocampo and Jose Arcilla?

I think it would be best to start with an outline. Once you fix the outline, you can farm out the rest and then seek the sources. --seav 12:17, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Rizal's Ladies

It is surprising the "juicy" part of Rizal's life on his Casanova-esque romances with ladies has not been discussed. I hope somebody will add a good discussion on this one. - Johnyang2

Rizal, the Romantic

There were at least nine women linked with Rizal; namely Segunda Katigbak, Leonor Valenzuela, Leonor Rivera, Consuelo Ortiga, O-Sei San, Gertrude Beckette, Nelly Boustead, Suzanne Jacoby and Josephine Bracken. These women might have been beguiled by his intelligence, charm and wit. Segunda Katigbak and Leonor Valenzuela Segunda Katigbak was her puppy love. Unfortunately, his first love was engaged to be married to a town mate- Manuel Luz. After his admiration for a short girl in the person of Segunda, then came Leonor Valenzuela, a tall girl from Pagsanjan. Rizal send her love notes written in invisible ink, that could only be deciphered over the warmth of the lamp or candle. He visited her on the eve of his departure to Spain and bade her a last goodbye.

Leonor Rivera Leonor Rivera, his sweetheart for 11 years played the greatest influence in keeping him from falling in love with other women during his travel. Unfortunately, Leonor’s mother disapproved of her daughter’s relationship with Rizal, who was then a known filibustero. She hid from Leonor all letters sent to her sweetheart. Leonor believing that Rizal had already forgotten her, sadly consented her to marry the Englishman Henry Kipping, her mother’s choice.

Consuelo Ortiga Consuelo Ortiga y Rey, the prettier of Don Pablo Ortiga’s daughters, fell in love with him. He dedicated to her A la Senorita C.O. y R., which became one of his best poems. The Ortiga's residence in Madrid was frequented by Rizal and his compatriots. He probably fell in love with her and Consuelo apparently asked him for romantic verses. He suddenly backed out before the relationship turned into a serious romance, because he wanted to remain loyal to Leonor Rivera and he did not want to destroy hid friendship with Eduardo de Lete who was madly in love with Consuelo.

O Sei San O Sei San, a Japanese samurai’s daughter taught Rizal the Japanese art of painting known as su-mie. She also helped Rizal improve his knowledge of Japanese language. If Rizal was a man without a patriotic mission, he would have married this lovely and intelligent woman and lived a stable and happy life with her in Japan because Spanish legation there offered him a lucrative job.

Gertrude Beckett While Rizal was in London annotating the Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas, he boarded in the house of the Beckett family, within walking distance of the British Museum. Gertrude, a blue-eyed and buxom girl was the oldest of the three Beckett daughters. She fell in love with Rizal. Tottie helped him in his painting and sculpture. But Rizal suddenly left London for Paris to avoid Gertrude, who was seriously in love with him. Before leaving London, he was able to finish the group carving of the Beckett sisters. He gave the group carving to Gertrude as a sign of their brief relationship.

Nellie Boustead Rizal having lost Leonor Rivera, entertained the thought of courting other ladies. While a guest of the Boustead family at their residence in the resort city of Biarritz, he had befriended the two pretty daughters of his host, Eduardo Boustead. Rizal used to fence with the sisters at the studio of Juan Luna. Antonio Luna, Juan’s brother and also a frequent visitor of the Bousteads, courted Nellie but she was deeply infatuated with Rizal. In a party held by Filipinos in Madrid, a drunken Antonio Luna uttered unsavory remarks against Nellie Boustead. This prompted Rizal to challenge Luna into a duel. Fortunately, Luna apologized to Rizal, thus averting tragedy for the compatriots.

Their love affair unfortunately did not end in marriage. It failed because Rizal refused to be converted to the Protestant faith, as Nellie demanded and Nellie’s mother did not like a physician without enough paying clientele to be a son-in-law. The lovers, however, parted as good friends when Rizal left Europe.

Suzanne Jacoby In 1890, Rizal moved to Brussels because of the high cost of living in Paris. In Brussels, he lived in the boarding house of the two Jacoby sisters. In time, they fell deeply in love with each other. Suzanne cried when Rizal left Brussels and wrote him when he was in Madrid.

Josephine Bracken In the last days of February 1895, while still in Dapitan, Rizal met an 18-year old petite Irish girl, with bold blue eyes, brown hair and a happy disposition. She was Josephine Bracken, the adopted daughter of George Taufer from Hong Kong, who came to Dapitan to seek Rizal for eye treatment. Rizal was physically attracted to her. His loneliness and boredom must have taken the measure of him and what could be a better diversion that to fall in love again. But the Rizal sisters suspected Josephine as an agent of the friars and they considered her as a threat to Rizal’s security.

Rizal asked Josephine to marry him, but she was not yet ready to make a decision due to her responsibility to the blind Taufer. Since Taufer’s blindness was untreatable, he left for Hon Kong on March 1895. Josephine stayed with Rizal’s family in Manila. Upon her return to Dapitan, Rizal tried to arrange with Father Antonio Obach for their marriage. However, the priest wanted a retraction as a precondition before marrying them. Rizal upon the advice of his family and friends and with Josephine’s consent took her as his wife even without the Church blessings. Josephine later give birth prematurely to a stillborn baby, a result of some incidence, which might have shocked or frightened her.

-In reply to the above : I wish you had signed your comment so I could reply to your userpage. I think it's a great idea to include the women in Rizal's life. However, the article is now too long per Wikipedia's standard. We are excising some of the less important info. Wikipedia recommends that articles be limited to 30 KB or less (if I remember right). The article now is now twice as long. You could start a separate article, perhaps with the title The Romantic Life of Rizal, or something to that effect. I really hope you would. Good luck! KaElin 23:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

In reply to the above: Do other Rizalians have already forgotten Ms. L?! The identity of Ms. L remained enigmatic as stated on the book of Professor Zaide. Though, was asked (by other historians through oral tradition of gathering some informations), Rizal admitted that he had this short-lived romantic affair with "Ms.L". As stated on Professor Zaide's book, Ms. L, as described by Rizal as: "fair with seductive eyes". And the reasons were the memories of Ms. L were already forgotten by him are as follows: (1) the sweet memory of Segunda was still in his heart and (2) his father objected to the match. (by Prudence101) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.46.54 (talk) 00:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


Outline

I'm basing this off Fr. Arcilla's standard history textbook. Some parts are probably unnecessary and some parts lacking, but I expect that we can sort this out soon. :)

Jose Rizal

  • Family
    • Mother
    • Father
    • Paciano
    • other siblings
  • Childhood
    • Injustice to:
      • Mother (Teodora Alonso)
      • Paciano
      • Jose Burgos
  • Education
    • Ateneo
    • UST
  • Voyage to Europe (should this fall under Education?)
    • Experience with the liberal Filipinos and teachers (Jaena, Morayta...)
  • France
    • Blumentritt
    • Noli
  • Return to Europe
    • Problems in Calamba (ejection of family)
    • El Fili
  • Hong Kong
  • Manila
    • La Liga Filipina/KKK
  • Dapitan
  • Cuban revolution
  • Cavite
  • Last days and Death
  • Legacy
    • Writings
Good luck and best wishes with improvement to Featured Article level :) Imacomp 19:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Rizal, originally Ricial

I would like more sources, links on the origin of the name to make corrections in the Latin version. Ricial doesn't seem to appear in any Spanish or Latin dictionary.Thank you.--Jondel 08:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Found this at rae:ricial. (De ricio). 1. adj. Se dice de la tierra en que, después de cortado el trigo en verde, vuelve a nacer o retoñar. 2. adj. Se dice de la tierra sembrada de verde para que se lo coma el ganado.


year of graduation in Madrid

What year did he graduate with a degree in medicine?--Jondel 02:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Jose Rizal statue in Heidelberg

Should this be mentioned? Doberdog 11:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)doberdog

ITA VERO(It should)!--Jondel 01:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Masonic Sources

I've added two American masonic sources, which may be an interesting area for new information on Rizal - particularly on his Masonic influences which are not discussed at the moment in this article.

One area that you may wish to consider would be whether his Freemasonry had any influence on his perceived anti-clericalism and pro-Americanism?

JASpencer 07:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

No it did not. Imacomp 13:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Removal of information by Imacomp can be seen here.
You'll also be able to see the sources there as well.
JASpencer 13:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

JASpencer, only you would want to know. Keep wako out of Wiki. Imacomp 13:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

What's whacko the Scottish Rite Journal or the Builder Magazine? JASpencer 13:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Sources

Kamusta po.

The first paragraph on this article seems iffy. I don't deny that Rizal was a poet,or an eye surgeon and certainly a polyglot, but to have a laundry list of economist, architect,........seems a little dubious. If rizal had theorized about how economics should work, that wouldn't automatically make him an economist. Likewise If he drew a plan for a house it doesn't make him an automatic architect. I think we need to qualify a few things for an article. 1. Set a criteria of what specifically constitutes an architect, or an economist. 2. Find historical evidence that rizal met those criterias.

How about if we say amateur? amateur economist, amateur architect, etc.?--Jondel 02:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Blame it on Gregorio Zaide. IMO, his book started the trend of "Rizal the Architect, the Economist, etc. etc.". I don't find this kind of trivializing in Guerrero's book (although, given the circumstances, Guerrero's book also has a different slant of its own...it was originally entered in a national competition for biography-writing on Rizal). In addition, despite what other people say about him, Ambeth Ocampo himself has misgivings about this treatment of Rizal (Ocampo makes this clear in his preface to Rizal Without the Overcoat) --- Tito Pao 20:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

I think it is very awkward how the introductory section was edited such that other supposed "titles" of Rizal read as amateur this and amateur that. Unless somebody finds something that would rightly prove Rizal had achieved such titles, I suggest not to place them in the article at all, especially not with the "amateur" prefix. --Sandra5482 07:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

No need to emphasize that Rizal is an "eye surgeon" and "an intellectual" in the first paragraph since it is already described in the succeeding paragraphs, especially paragraph 3. - 7258

Courage

"Courage" is hardly NPOV. The argument could be made that while Rizal was a reformer, he was essentially a Spanish loyalist, an accidental martyr more due to his personal pride rather than any sense of nationalism. See Nick Joaquin's "A Question of Heroes." ZoneSeek 04:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Well I guess that is a matter of opinion, Zone. But you can't deny it was his literary work (Noli, Fili, etc) and his MARTYRDOM that inspired the revolution led by Bonifacio which subsequently led to the Spanish colonialists washing their hands off us and handing us over to the Americans. Rizal was for reforms, which he hoped would ultimately lead to the end of colonialization. He could not just inspire an armed revolution because he knew we indios were incapable of it. He foresaw things. He was a visionary. He had much more common sense than Bonifacio and Aguinaldo who failed in their attempts. He was no accidental martyr. He went willingly to the slaughter house. Nick Joaquin was wrong. More than a century after his death, Filipinos would have realized by now whether he deserved to the national hero or not.KaElin 23:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Nick Joaquin himself was a POV writer (pro-Cavite?), as are necessarily all historians. Uthanc 04:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Japanese blood?

I probably missed out on my Rizal class, but this I never learned that Rizal had a drop of Japanese blood in his veins. Any references for this? Thanks!

  • I think this was mentioned in Gregorio Zaide's biography. (I'll need to double-check this, though) --- Tito Pao 11:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Without Rizal

If it wasn;t for his literary masterpiece, The Spanish-American war would have more international involvement than the Spanish Civil War. Turthfully a Kaiser made a letter to help Spain save their colonies from America

Moved Page

I've edited the redirects so that when people type in "Rizal", they'll be directed to this page, not the province. This is because in the Philippines, when Filipinos (especially students in all levels) hear the word "Rizal", the first thing that always comes to their mind is the national hero, not the province near Manila. Also, foreigners may want to know more about Jose Rizal, so it's best to have the word "Rizal" redirect to Rizal's biography.

(Sorry if I made some mistakes along the way, this is the first time I've moved pages and edited redirects; please let me know if I made more mistakes and I'll be happy to learn from you :) --- Tito Pao 11:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I've reverted the move. Washington does not redirect to George Washington but instead to the actual state of Washington itself while there is a disambiguation notice for Washington, D.C.. It's most preferable to have the names of provinces by themselves (without the (province) suffix) as reasonable as possible. There is a redirect to José Rizal anyway on the Rizal page. Thanks. --Chris S. 18:33, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Noted. Thanks for the clarification :) --- Tito Pao 18:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

NPoV

_ _ I tagged the article {{POV}}, and User:KaElin [removed that http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jos%C3%A9_Rizal&oldid=80282115] saying

delete {{POV}} if there's conflicting opinion place it w/par or sentence, not the whole article

and said on my talk page in part "Which part of the article? If someone is questioning a sentence or paragraph, he/she should tag it with" {{fact}}.
_ _ Tag or not, the article as a whole is infected with PoV. The overwhelming bulk of the lead 'graph is emblematic of this: Beyond his name and vital stats it has 96 words.

In the first sentence, 29% of the 96 are devoted exclusively with poetic titles, each PoV, applied to him.
The next 8% calls him, as if it were a fact, (emphasis added)
the national hero of the Philippines.
47% is a sentence purporting as fact his "intelligence", "his passion as a patriot", and "the centrality of national identity as a social force in the project of nation-building ".
"Intelligence" is a PoV term: applied according to individual PoV to various subjective qualities, and to objective ones whose appropriateness as respective claims to constituting "real" intelligence is a matter of PoV.
"Passion" can only be inferred by various PoV standards, and the circumstances where it occurs support only (PoV) guesses at whether its objects are, for instance, "patriotism", greed, or megalomania.
What is "central" in "the project of nation-building" and in fact what a "nation" is and in what senses one can be "built" are all matters of vigorous debate, despite the author's implicit PoV that the Phillipine "nation" has the answers to those questions.
The final 16% is a presumably clearly verifiable statement by Benedict Anderson, a Marxist commentator. His New York Times Google hits are less than 1/30 of those of Richard Hofstadter (another commentator on nations that i have heard of before, and happen to have been reading about today), yet it was BA that the PoV of the article deemed to merit attention in the first 'graph.

_ _ If Phillipine nationals and/or ethnic Filipinos are hysterical, as the writer is, about JR's qualities, the statement that it is hysteria or enthusiasm or obsession is PoV, but paralleled by specific facts which should be stated at some point in the article -- facts that can be measured, probably by relative book sales and opinion polling. And the existence of the epithets will supplement those facts. But if the lead 'graph of this article were close to NPoV, it would still be improved by inserting, between the vital fact and the epithets,

... did nothing notable. Nevertheless, he is ...

I don't suggest that that would be improvement for his bio. But the emphasis of the lead graph, and the failure of the lead section to get down to specifics, are the highlights of a PoV problem infecting the article as a whole: the choices of what to say in the the lead sent and the lead 'graph reflect a PoV about what is significant, and the article is written as an expression of a PoV. There is a lot of undoubtedly valuable material in it, but it needs ruthless restatement, re-ordering, and selection in order to comply with WP:NPoV.
_ _ On reflection, i am restoring the PoV tag. The problem is article-wide; i think the use of the tag article-wide is more the rule than the exception, and even if it has shortcomings, it will be useful in bringing the attention of those qualified to fix it. Those who aren't, from inability to see at a glance that it has a global PoV problem, should defer to them, rather than flaunting that difference.
--Jerzy•t 03:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

_ _ If the Admin thinks the article is infected and hopelessly beyond repair, the whole article should be deleted. To replace sentences just to remove PoV, which text are prone to be, like labeling the effort which had veered too much into PoV, like "hysteria" which I believe is PoV, is likely to reduce it to mere statements of facts, more like number of homeruns hit, batting average lifetime, etc.
_ _ How accurately percentages were figured out by him is still beyond me, maybe he should expound on his formula more. There could be degrees of "accomplishment" so people who may have achieved something centuries back could be ranked with modern-day achievers, etc. There seems to be a lot more that should be said on this matter. Thanks. EAP
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.181.98 (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2006
_ _ Presumably "the admin" refers to me, tho i have not used any admin capability in connection with this article -- nor does it seem reasonable to anticipate my doing so. Yeah, it's an indication that i've hung around here editing for a while, and presumably learned a thing or two, but please remember that the "coat of arms" of the admins has a bucket and mop, and not even a bundle of sticks, let alone a carnivorous beast. Don't let me scare you! (Unless you and maybe a friend or two plan to ignore everyone else and resist every effort to solve problems.)
_ _ The numbers i cited were not intended to be examined closely. IIRC, MS Word reported something like 98 words total, which means 49 words is 50% and 24 or 25 is 25%; my math (done more by feel than by formal calculations) was implicitly describing the relative sizes of paragraphs, and intended to be as much impressionistic as scientific.
_ _ "Infected", IMO, but not "hopelessly beyond repair" -- and in retrospect, i see that i was playing too rough in throwing around "if ... Filipinos are hysterical", especially in speaking as a Euro-descended Yank about an East-Asian country that i used to think of as Hispanic. It is a very rare article that is so inherantly PoV as to deserve deletion, nor do i even think that this one should be reduced to an NPoV stub. There are a lot of presumably verifiable facts implicit in the article, and what is needed is not to cut out "X" but to change it to something along the general lines of "most Filipinos believe X".
--Jerzy•t 19:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
_ _ Jerzy, Rizal is the national hero of the Philippines. He was declared, confirmed, attested by a law (or Act) passed by your countrymen (if you're an American). I will get back to you on which Act it was. A province, many streets, many towns, many schools, a university and a national monument were erected and named after him. A Rizal Law was passed that made the reading of his literary work a requirement in high school and college. Rizal Day (December 31?, I've been out of the country 24 years) is celebrated as a national non-working holiday. The only other Filipino, I think, honored thus (with a national non-working holiday) is Benigno Aquino. Rizal is accepted, acknowledged, recognized by an overwhelming majority of Filipinos as the national hero. Of course, there are some who challenge this. We will try to change, esp. the first paragraph, to present a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) altho a difficult task because most writers/historians accounts are hagiographic, and, as you put it, tend to veer too much into "hysteria."
_ _ Although it is one writer (Umbriago) that dominates the article, it is in fact a joint effort of many. But you are probably right that we should include a dissenting view of Rizal being the premier hero, or question his status as such. There are a few books that hold this contention --"Rizal without the Overcoat" by Ocampo, books by Nick Joaquin and by Renato Constantino, altho I can't get hold of them.
_ _ Jerzy, you mentioned Benedict Anderson as having only 1/30th google hits compared to Hofstadter. Anderson, Maoist or not, is a recognized expert on Southeast Asian politics/culture (specifically, Indonesia) while Hofstadter, I think, do not write about Southeast Asia, if ever, and never about the little impoverished country called the Philippines. We (specifically Umbriago) have to quote at least one non-Filipino to write "hysterically" (as you put it) about Rizal. A foreigner writing about Rizal makes it more believable, right?
_ _ We will try to make editions to present a less biased POV. I will try to do some and invite all the other contributors to do so also. Thanks.
KaElin 15:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
_ _ Tho i'd not heard of Rizal before, i recall the martyred Aquino, and noting the similar rare holiday status between him and Rizal is a valuable fact for the article. (But keep in mind that "martyr" is PoV; my considering him a martyr for purposes of this talk page is not a endorsement of calling him one in the article, as opposed to saying he is called one.) Likewise, Congressional endorsement (probably, BTW, in a resolution, or in the ineffective preamble of a law, rather than as a matter of making law) of "national hero" status by a legislature (a foreign colonial one at that!), or the Pope, doesn't make heroism or martyrdom a fact: hierarchs and parliaments can only justify confering such statuses by using "hero", "martyr", and so on in special PoV senses, or by speaking only for the attention of those whose PoV includes slavish endorsement of their authority to change reality with a few words.
_ _ I do think foreign and mainstream historians have much less presumption of bias to overcome than those with ethnic ties or revolutionary PoVs, tho i wouldn't choose the wording "more believable". My citation of Hofstadter's ideas (i think the lk works permanently w/o registration) really reflected my awareness from that review of the "Intellectual Bio" on him, and IIRC his challenging some ideas of what makes the US a "nation". I'm pretty sure what makes nations remains a matter of PoV, while IMO the article presumes as a fact one account of how nationhood is established.
--Jerzy•t 19:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

jose rizal

is it rizal guilty in the revolution why he was a hero?

I betcha the British will punish George Washington if they've won. ;) --Howard the Duck 13:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

to Will Beback re: LaRouche

What is the logic behind the removal of the link to Schiller Institute ? Yes, it was founded by LaRouche's wife, but so what? The link to Rizal is Schiller's influence on his writings, not LaRouche's. The LaRouche controversy stems from his perceived anti-semitism, however, his bigotry is not found in either Schiller's or Rizal's writings. You deleted the link, yet not the link in the Wiki article Schiller Institute. Wikipedia is supposed to be unbiased and non-partisan. LaRouche may be anti-semitic, Marxist, ultra-conservative, etc., but the article linked to Rizal is none of those things. Let the reader decide. KaElin 23:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I left a note on your talk page too. The Schiller Institute is not a reliable source for anything except its own views, per decision of the ArbCom. One of the SI's biases is promoting the importance and influence of Schiller, a bias which is apparent in the cited article. Due to the efforts of yourself and other editors, there are many better sources for this fine article. -Will Beback · † · 00:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, am not aware of the ArbCom decision. Too bad that a fine writer like John Morris is associated with the cultist LaRouche, but it was Morris' article that made mention of Rizal's legacy on Gandhi, and Tagore.KaElin 03:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Is Jose Rizal for Real?

I would like to discuss the possibility that Jose Rizal was just a pawn, setup by his chinese peers. Consider at that time that revolutionaryos have already cleared the countryside of spaniards and in my understanding the next group of aliens that would be booted out from the philippines are the chinese. The chinese at that time controls trading, manufacturing and they are into land grabbing in the countryside. I would like also to point out that it is common knowledge that the chinese in the philippines were changing their surnames into spanish or filipino sounding names to hide their race, e.g. Jose Rizal. In my honest opinion, Jose Rizal should not be a hero. Rizal should be the hero of the chinese.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lbonifacio (talk • contribs) 08:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC).


There is no possibilty of such. Rizal is also called the greatest the Malayn race ver produced. He signed as dimas alng, indio, and FILIPINO.

Rizal the first FILIPINO

Please read the whole article. It was Rizal's great-great-great grandfather Domingo Lamco who changed his surname to Mercado, not Rizal. Jose Rizal eventually changed his name to Rizal (from Mercado) because of his brother's connection to Gomburza. People put too much emphasis on Rizal's chinese ancestry. Rizal has a lot more indigenuous Malay blood than Chinese. Like the typical Filipino, his ancestry is very diverse--malay, chinese, spanish, japanese, even indigenous negrito. There is no such thing as a "pure Filipino."

GA review

See: Wikipedia:What is a good article?

This article is well written. There are minor grammar errors (I just corrected a few) and disfluencies indicative of a non-native speaker, but the phrasing structure is clear and well organized and so corrections are straightforward. The logical structure and grouping of the article is good. Both hierarchical sections and links to main articles on subtopics are used.

The article provides adequate references and uses inline citations. The sources are reliable and the article contains no original research.

All major aspects of the topic are addressed, or briefly summarized and a more comprehensive article linked to. There is no non-notable trivia.

The article follows NPOV, but could benefit from the removal of some of the laudatory adjectives. Since all of the claims seem to be appropriately sourced, this is more of a style concern than a factual one.

The edit history shows that the article is relatively stable, with some vandal activity but no apparent ongoing edit wars. On a month-to-month basis the article has undergone few recent structural changes.

There are several useful images, all of which are tagged and have descriptive captions.

While the article is somewhat long, occasionally too praising, and suffers from minor grammar issues and occasional awkward phrasing, all of these issues could be fixed by a quick trimming down of some of the superlatives and laudatory phrases and sentences. There is far more good in this article than remaining problems, and I think it should be granted "Good Article" status.

--Sapphic 17:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Length: For articles longer than about 25 kB, rigorous reviewing of the Wikipedia peer review and featured article candidates guidelines is often more appropriate than the process here.

Thanks for the review. Much appreciated. Berserkerz Crit 19:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Rizal on the Philippine Peso Image...

This must be revised to the latest coin being used in the RP.

No problem. However, I think it's a better idea to not delete the 1970s coin image. This will show that Rizal, then and now, has always been on the 1-peso coin. --- Tito Pao 03:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

"further reading" section needs attention

There was a section full of external links and information about books. That section was wrongly called "references". This is wrong because Wikipedia uses that title for the section that contains the article's <ref>'s. I fixed that by changing the name to "further reading", but the content of that section still needs attention. What goes in that list? It looks like some should be moved to "external links", some should be added as <ref>s within the article text, and some should be deleted. ...but I can't do this. Gronky 13:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Age 11 photograph

I've edited the caption to indicate that this was an image of Rizal as a student at the Ateneo Municpal. The image source says it was taken when he was 11 years old, and this source says that he first enrolled at the Ateneo Municipal when he was 11 years old. Rmcsamson 17:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

R.A. 1425 a.k.a. Rizal Law

an act to include in the curricula of all public and private schools, colleges and universities on the life, works and writings of jose rizal, particularly his novels noli me tangere and el filibusterismo, authorizing the printing and distribution thereof, and for other purposes.

Can you put a section for this?--210.213.175.96 (talk) 10:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


____________________________________________________________________________________________ Yeah, I would like also to know the real purpose or relating the history of Rizal and his contributions to all courses in the universities. For some, it's just an adiitional unit that will be paid. (No offense po.)

spelling of Rizal's name

Hello. Would like to ask for any sources/references regarding the spelling of Rizal's name. In the Philippines, his name is usually written "Jose" although according to current Spanish rules of spelling, it should be "José", with an accent on the "e". I have encountered the same situation with names of other historic figures (like José Ma. Guerrero). Did these people (Rizal, Guerrero, etc.) actually write and sign their names with accent marks? Thanks. 124.107.1.42 (talk) 11:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)dnong

Actually this has been discussed before and the consensus was to have the accented "e" for all Filipinos during the Spanish era. --Howard the Duck 13:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh sorry. I wonder if the discussions are archived somewhere. Could you tell me how to access the archives of past discussions? Thank you. 125.5.36.66 (talk) 02:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)dnong

See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Philippine-related articles). --Howard the Duck 13:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

How Jose got the name "Rizal"

http://www.nhi.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=122&Itemid=2 http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/4982/zayde1.html

It is stated in the article that Jose adopted the name "Rizal" when he enrolled as a student at the Ateneo Municipal de Manila. However, the links above states that

In the year 1849 (before Jose Rizal's birth in 1861), as mentioned above, Governor Narciso Claveria issued a decree directing all Filipino families to choose new surnames from a list of Spanish family names (Catálogo alfabético de apellidos)....Jose's father, Francisco (Mercado)...chose the surname Rizal, which was not in the list recommended by the Spanish authorities....the children of Lorenzo Alberto Alonso adopted the name "Realonda". Hence Teodora Alonso (Rizal's mother) became Teodora Alonso Realonda, or simply Teodora Realonda.

The website http://www.joserizal.ph/bg01.html (already referenced in this article) also calls Jose's father as or Francisco Rizal Mercado. All of Jose's siblings are also named "Rizal", implying that his whole family took on the name, not just Jose. (Apparently, after Franciso's changing of his name to Rizal caused some confusion in his business affairs. He compromised and called himself Francisco Rizal Mercado) If there are no objections, I will change the information accordingly.

(Note: Spanish naming customs dictate that names usually follow the format "(Given name) (Father's surname) y (Mother's maiden name)". So if this is followed, and it is agreed that the surnames of Jose's parents were "Rizal Mercado" and "Alonso Realonda" respectively, then that would mean that Jose's name would be "José Protacio Rizal Mercado y Alonso Realonda...or "José Protacio Rizal" for short "). His name is sometimes given only as "José Protacio Rizal y Alonso" with two apparent reasons: 1) Again, "Rizal" was the name his father had chosen (and preferred) for his family, and 2) Even if the Alonso family became the "Alonso Realonda" (or just "Realonda") family, Rizal's mother preferred to call herself "Teodora Alonso"

http://geocities.com/sinupan/AlonzoT.htm - "Rizal wrote bititrly: "From Manila they sent her to Sta. Cruz, Laguna Province, through mountains, from town to town, because she did not call herself Realonda de Rizal but simply Teodora Alonso!" 125.60.243.115 (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Hi guys, seems that I have noticed some vandalism in this particular article... kindly see the words SM north edsa and Trinoma... It is really a pity to those who do these things, they really dont have the manners... kindly undo your edits.... god bless Charlie alpha (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


Protacio or Protasio?

Can anyone verify the spelling of Rizal's name? Is it "Protacio" or "Protasio"? (Note: Britannica online, and a book by Gregorio F. Zaide list it as "Protasio") 122.53.107.13 (talk) 12:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Under the section Persecution there is a statement of Protacio's torture on his brother's complicity in the revolution. Can anyone cite the source of this paragraph?

I can verify the spelling of Rizal's second name. It is Protasio, after San Protasio (Saint Protase), Bishop of Milan whose feast day is June 19 in the Roman Catholic Calendar. There is no such saint as San Protacio, only San Protasio (See Catholic Encyclopedia, List of Saints, etc.). Furthermore, I am a Filipino historian, and I've seen Rizal's extant diplomas from Ateneo de Manila with his name clearly spelled, "José Protasio Rizal". Fadulj (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Travelling alone

Twice in the article it's mentioned that he travelled alone to Spain to study medicine. By "alone" what I understand is that he travelled without known companions. What is the significance of travelling alone? People were not known to travel alone during the time? Jay (talk) 05:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Is Rizal a really a linguist or just a polyglot?

A lot of people consider Rizal as a linguist which I think is not correct. He did speak 22 languages (or more) but that does not make him a linguist. Linguists are those who study and specializes in language while polyglots are those who can speak many languages, which fits Rizal. However, when I was doing a research in one of my language subjects I found out that Rizal had a study on Tagalog. According to the language book, which I could no longer remember the remember, that i have read Rizal attempted to parse a Tagalog sentence. Unfortunately, i could not corroborate this claim yet as i still need to find more references on this one. Hope someone could help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superficialistics (talk • contribs) 20:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

retraction - one sided

Not neutral. Please add other contrasting argument and data. If not this cannot be called controversy!! Pinoyrk (talk) 08:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I added references to the other side of the controversy. Since you were the one questioning the issue of neutrality, you should judge if these were sufficient. You could also make additional research and edits on the issue. If satisfactory, the POV template must be removed.KaElin (talk) 18:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Improved but not quite. Statements like "Many continue to believe", "claims", "insisted" are not neutral. Suggest summarize reference [20] that contains this: http://joserizal.info/Reflections/retraction.htm . Looks very neutral and merely summarizes controversy. Pinoyrk (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
The number of witnesses mentioned here should also be included: http://www.bukal.com/pdfs/rizals%20conversion-pp.rtf —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinoyrk (talk • contribs) 04:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
I've done revisions suggested here. Marax (talk) 03:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
I've added another balancing perspective in the conclusion of this section. This is also suggested by Dr. Eugene A. Hessel: that there are various attitudes towards the retraction. Marax (talk)

Vandalism (Semi-Protection Status ?)

There are instances of vandalism of late by anonymous users which are difficult to revert because of legitimate edits made in between. I myself did some edits (referenced Rizal in popular culture) without realizing previous vandalism has been made. If anyone can help with this it would be greatly appreciated. I also suggest that anonymous users be prevented in making edits.KaElin (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I nominated the article for a semi-protection from unsigned IP users and removed some of the vandals... hopefully, the protection will at least limits vandalism in the article--peads (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
OK now the article is now semi-protected for two weeks.. --peads (talk) 16:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Good job, Donmar. Thanks! KaElin (talk) 01:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

No Problem!--peads (talk) 06:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

External links- Filipiniana.net

I added a non-commercial website, Filipiniana.net, that seems to have a more exhaustive (and complete?) bibliography of JPR than any other, including the Jose Rizal website (The latter is less annotative and poorly crafted, IMO)KaElin (talk) 19:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Execution

Someone deleted my addition that "Consummatum est", which Rizal said before he died, were among Christ's last words from the cross, as cited in "The Gospel of John" (John 19:30) in the Bible. To add that is not editorializing, but providing encyclopedic context. Rizal was raised Catholic at a time when Latin was the language of worship and the Bible, and most Westerners were more familiar with Biblical language than today. The Seven Last Words of Christ were often used as meditations during Lent, Holy Week and Good Friday. Rizal clearly chose these words deliberately, as he said them in Latin. This is significant as a means of understanding him. It did not mean he accepted Catholic dogma, but had a symbolic sense of his life and work. --Parkwells (talk) 01:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Note that Rizal drew from the Gospels for the Latin title of his first novel Noli me Tangere ("Touch me not", or "Don't cling to me".) This was what Christ was reported to have said to Mary Magdalene when she recognized him after the Resurrection.--Parkwells (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems

This article needs a thorough and careful review for copyright issues, some of which are likely to have originated with User:Jakosalem and at least one of his socks, User:LuckyYou. Some text currently in the article is plainly drawn from [3], copied in this series of edits. Text from [4] was brought into the article here. Some of the text he placed is from the public domain biography, here. This is obviously an important article with many watchers and contributor. Given that, I'm just tagging this for cleanup. I hope that the regular contributors can swiftly address this. Otherwise I or another administrator will likely have to remove suspect text after about a week. Thanks for any assistance you can provide! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

As there's been no movement on this and an unstable IP has several times removed the tag, I've blanked and semi-protected the article. User:Jakosalem and his socks have heavily imported copyrighted material into multiple articles on Wikipedia, very likely including this one. Prior to this edit, I don't see substantive content added to the article by this user. However, with Jakosalem's next series of edits, substantive text was introduced which seems clearly to infringe on this. In this series of edits several days later, he seems to have infringed on this source and this one. There may well be others. (This series of edits seems to have pulled from a PD Source, though I haven't checked to be sure that copyrighted text wasn't also included. It violates Wikipedia:Plagiarism, but so long as the PD source is the only one copied, not the copyright policy. This series of edits may have plagiarized from the same source.)
I can't verify that this is all of the material added by this user, as in addition to his main account and his two identified socks, he has also edited as an IP under various addresses.
At the least, the identified material will need to be rewritten or removed. It may be possible to revert to the last identifiably clean, but the article will subsequently need to be watched to be sure that the contributor doesn't restore it, as text was restored to the article Marcelo H. del Pilar. It also might be possible to excise the identified violations (the PD edits should in that case be double-checked to be sure that copyrighted text is not intermingled and it should be attributed to satisfy WP:Plagiarism.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on José Rizal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on José Rizal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Jose Rizal not a nationalist

Rizal didn't want the Philippines to be independent, he wanted it to be be directly controlled by Spain. Thus he is not a nationalist especially since how can you be a nationalist if you don't want an independent nation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheaxHendible (talk • contribs) 22:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 December 2016

180.191.130.34 (talk) 13:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 Not done--Create/Login to an user account & create the page.If you prefer to be anonymous,use WP:AFC for creating new articles.Light❯❯❯ Saber 13:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 October 2016

Julius Coronel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.66.151.66 (talk) 06:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ᜋᜊᜆ᜔ (talk) 22:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2014

I guess some people prefer misspellings in their work?66.74.176.59 (talk) 21:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Since I can't find "pubilshign" with CTRL+F on this page, I couldn't tell what misspelling you were referring to, so I assumed your edit was vandalism. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 21:31, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Well, I guess I must have one of those special computers that make up things out of clear air? Mayvbe, take a try at a WP search?66.74.176.59 (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 21:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
You seem to be a real winner. Thank goodness WP has found you. And as for vandalism, I was under the impression it was an act of maliciousness. Would be unfortunate to have you as a neighbor.66.74.176.59 (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2021

Add that there is a monument of Jose Rizal in Chicago, IL. See: https://www.chicagoparkdistrict.com/parks-facilities/dr-jose-rizal-monument 2604:CA00:1DA:4305:0:0:1060:8C5C (talk) 01:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

 Already done The article already mentions the monument in Chicago. ––FORMALDUDE(talk) 03:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Rumors of fathering both Hitler and Yamashita

In Filipino pop culture in recent years if not decades, rumor has it Jose Rizal, the man of many myths in the Philippines was known to study abroad in many nations and knew up to 20 languages, has impregnated a maid, an Austrian woman in July 1888 when they were together in Halle, Germany when Rizal was studying over there, and the woman happened to return in April 1889 to deliver a baby boy named...Adolf Hitler. And earlier in 1885, he was in Tokyo impregnated a Japanese woman to have a baby named...Tomoyuki Yamashita, and Rizal was in Japan trying to have Japanese support for the independence of the Philippines against white European colonial rule of the archipelago nation. Note the two leaders (Hitler in Germany and Yamashita a Japanese military general during WW2) are in countries that formed an alliance during WW2 against the USA, esp the USA took over the Philippines from Spain after a war against them in 1898 and the Japanese invaded and occupied the Philippines from 1941 until the USA drove out the Japanese in 1945 and executed Yamashita the following year when the Philippines was granted its independence. And there are even speculations when Rizal was in London from Jan to Jul 1888, he might be Jack the Ripper to killed 6 prostitutes and when he left England, the murders stopped. Should it be added to the article as possibilities or just unproven myths that don't contribute to the article? 2603:8001:2601:F351:7077:B70:9219:C219 (talk) 23:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

aral

the jose rezal

49.145.192.149 (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Filipino

information about jose rizal 2001:4454:609:2C00:1EA:23F0:5035:9811 (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:José_Rizal/Archive_1&oldid=1181644327"