Talk:John Woolcombe

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RfC about short sections[edit]

Should short articles, like this one, consist of several single sentence/paragraph sections? —SMALL JIM 11:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why on earth is this a WP:RFC matter? I don't see any evidence that WP:RFCBEFORE has been observed, so why have you gone straight to a full-blown thirty-day formal RfC? Have you considered, for example, the guidance at WP:STUB? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: As explained at Talk:Manor of Scadbury, perhaps some more detail may have been useful, but I thought I should keep things simple, as recommended. I can't discuss it with the other editor because he refuses to discuss anything with me or listen to any of my advice - see, for instance this edit and Talk:Thomas Walsingham (died 1457). A pretty unique situation I guess. Had I explained everything in sufficient detail, I thought it would have put everyone off. Would you give an opinion on the question, please? —SMALL JIM 19:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I refer you to my reply at Talk:Manor of Scadbury#RfC about distinguishing people with the same name. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]