Talk:Joe Keeper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nicholas D'Alessandro.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current day Joe Keeper[edit]

In researching this article, I ran across mentions of a modern day Joe Keeper, as being a person who has been interviewed frequently on Cree topics. I imagine this is a son or grandson of this Joe Keeper, but I don't have any proof of that. Any information as to what his relationship is to this Joe Keeper? There's also a ferry, M.V. Joe Keeper, and I wanted to add that to the Joe Keeper article, but there was nothing to prove whom it was named for. Does anybody have input to that? Corvus cornixtalk 18:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joe Keeper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article Critique[edit]

1. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? After reviewing the article each fact has a proper,reliable reference associated with it. Each fact has a hyperlink associated somewhere in the details of the information, each hyperlink is up to date and working. For example when clicking on the 1912 Canadian Summer Olympic Team hyperlink, I was instantly brought to the Wikipedia page with additional details on the 1912 summer games.

2. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? I believe that the information on Joe Keepers page is well organized and relevant to the individual. The three main headings, Early and personal life, career and legacy all stay to the prescribed topics and do not distract the reader. The order of the information presented is such that the reader can flow from topic to topic very easily, each topic expanding on a different part of Joe's life. The article is a great summary of Joe Keepers life.

3. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article remains neutral throughout its entirety. The article gives an unbiased view on the accomplishments, personal life and impact Joe had on the world. There is no bias with his position in World War 1, no bias towards his competition on Olympic teams and no bias on his accomplishments. This article is completely unbiased and well written. Nicholas D'Alessandro (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]