Talk:Jigoku-Retsuden
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Studio album?[edit]
Obviously this album was recorded in the studio, but does it belong alongside Psycho Circus and all the others, or should it go under compilations? Just because it is essentially greatest hits redone and not an original album. Tom walker (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- For the sake of consistency it should go with compilations. Note that both "Killers" and "Smashes..." are classified as compilations, despite the fact that "Killers" include 4 original songs, while "Smashes..." include several re-worked studio songs as well as 2 original studio songs. Relrel (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Jigoku-Retsuden is not the same as Killers and Smashes, Thrashes & Hits because Jigoku-Retsuden contains only newly recorded tracks. So, it's not really a compilation. Charles Essie (talk) 03:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
who exeactly is the Wiki authority on KISS? lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Repkow (talk • contribs) 04:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Repkow - it's not a matter of being an authority on any certain band, but a lot of people on here have their panties too tightly wound on what constitutes an original album, a compilation album, or a live album. I had a nice row with a wanker over whether or not the songs on a John Fogerty live album were the first time that he did old Creedence material since he'd left that band. Hilarious stuff here. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 19:49, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jigoku-Retsuden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120908075800/http://www.melodic.net/?page=review&id=7080 to http://www.melodic.net/?page=review&id=7080
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Exclusively ?[edit]
Be careful when using absolutes such as "exclusively", as in "exclusively in Japan". I've got this CD, and I didn't buy it in Japan. Yes, it came with Sonic Boom which, to someone's credit, was mentioned on this page. Maybe reword the original passage to read "...originally released in 2008 by the band Kiss exclusively in Japan....". Also note that I removed the extraneous comma that doesn't need to be there. Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)