Talk:Jessica Eye

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jessica Eye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you are a very petty person who wants to trash Jessica Eye...[edit]

If you are a very petty person who wants to trash Jessica Eye, at least have the decency to post your material in the body of the article (possibly in a new section of it) instead of putting it in the introductory paragraph like a big ol' attention hoe.— Preceding unsigned comment added by an unknown user June 16, 2020‎ 47.37.102.223


A wikipedia article is not here for public relations services. It is an accurate summary of the already stated material in the body of the article. References are there as well. There is nothing controversial about it. Bigbaby23 (talk) 03:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bigbaby23 Good day. Pls note that the info that Eye missed weights and lost fights have already recored in the body text which is supported by source. We dont need to repeat again in the body text. In additional the info is not so important that should be in the WP:LEAD section. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]