Talk:Jay Neveloff

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

The subject of the article came to my attention while working on a legal profession data base project involving the big law firms in America that in one way or another are tied into the world of the president. I have never spoken or communicated with the subject nor with anyone in his law firm in any way, except to request the image. I am interested in and have been reading a lot about achievers in law and thought I had done enough research on this subject that made clear he is a very notable lawyer in the real estate field nationally, as well as a lawyer for Trump. There is nothing in the article or my writing that intends to promote the subject rather than simply bring to Wikipedia more useful information about people in a profession that is becoming a very big part of the economy. Ildar2013 (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Style and references[edit]

This article has a style that reads heavily like an advertisement. The frequent use of quotes from trade publications, sometimes without citations, lends itself to this advertising tone. I have rewritten sentences to make their tone more neutral, as well as removed sentences that refer solely to a firm, not to Mr. Neveloff himself (those who want a description of the firm can click through to the article about that firm). Plandu (talk) 06:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Plandu: – As the advert and POV tags you placed on this article 3+ years ago remain, I would like to work toward getting this article to a place where those tags could be justifiably removed, perhaps with the removal of the “Media coverage” section. Please note I am doing so on behalf of Jay Neveloff and Kramer Levin and therefore have a COI. In your opinion, would the removal of that content be sufficient? NinaSpezz (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: – You made some quality improvements to this article a few years ago, removing promotional puffery. The editor who originally placed the advert and POV tags on this article has not responded to my note (above) in over a month. Hoping you might be able to weigh in here on justifiably removing these tags, perhaps with the removal of the “Media coverage” section. Please note I'm working on behalf of Jay Neveloff and Kramer Levin and therefore have a COI. NinaSpezz (talk) 18:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

I would like to upload and add this image of Jay Neveloff [1] to this article's infobox in order to improve its quality. The image is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license and is therefore acceptable for use on Wikipedia.

Since I have a declared COI with the subject of this article, I wanted to first make this proposal here on the talk page.

@Theroadislong: - Since you were helpful in making a very recent edit on this page, was hoping you might be able to weigh in here.

NinaSpezz (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes go ahead, seems fine to me. Theroadislong (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]