Talk:Japan–Soviet Union relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk[edit]

Ok Ive got [1], and..im sure theire are others. This seems like a copyvio. You assert public domain use, but can you verify that?

Please see Library of Congress Country Studies -- all these publications are in the public domain. MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip 22:18, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Can you find a non-Wikipedia citation of the public domain assertion? Ëvilphoenix Burn! 00:54, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. From the Library of Congress Country Studies Frequently Asked Questions:
How can I obtain copyright permission to reproduce or use portions of the text or graphics from the Country Studies?
With the exception of some photographs, which are clearly marked in the photograph's caption, text and graphics contained in the Country Studies On-Line are not copyrighted. They are considered to be in the public domain and thus available for free and unrestricted use. As a courtesy, however, we ask that appropriate credit be given to the series. If you or your publisher require specific written permission for the record, queries should be directed via Email to frds@loc.gov.
Cheers, MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip 08:30, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

South Sakhalin dispute[edit]

Is there really one? I mean, on an official level? Andelarion 23:28, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Made up by the article author.--Theocide 23:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

War Paragraph[edit]

The text in the following paragraph is in need of a citation. Other articles, like the one on Operation August Storm, provides sources to the contrary. In addition to that, do conclusions like this actually belong in this article? Perhaps they may be better addressed in the Surrender of Japan page or elsewhere.

Japan's decision to surrender was made before the scale of the Soviet attack on Manchuria, Sakhalin, and the Kuril Islands was known...

Penkov 14:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

not a single source[edit]

the whole article could be deleted, there is no sources back anything up what it says.--Quandapanda (talk) 18:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]