Talk:January Events

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citations[edit]

What kind of citations are needed? There is more than enough information though it is in Lithuanian language (mostly). The trial is still on-going, but the factual information was already gathered for it. So there is no possibility for this page to be somehow one-sided or having insufficient claims for those Russian Wiki editors to add this 'insufficient' citations mark. Factual information confirms of soviet soldiers shooting unarmed citizens first and videos can easily confirm it. so it seems like Russian wiki editors are just defending Soviet union. --91.233.177.98 (talk) 13:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide links to those sources, including video evidence, that easily confirm this version of events? Preferably in English. 98.242.4.66 (talk) 07:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Old talk[edit]

On looking at the intro, I see that the author apparently envisages Wikipedia as a sort of the Lithuanian nationalist propaganda machine. Please grow up. Once you start pushing your POV and describing the actions of the central administration towards a region as "aggression", the answer will follow promptly, sometime symmetrical, sometimes not. --Ghirla | talk 15:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I have changed it to actions. What else? Renata 15:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
After the title was NPOVed, I removed the tags. Now it needs to be proofread and grammar improved. --Ghirla | talk 15:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then. Aggression, however, might be used by the central government against regions seeking independence - be it Iraqi Kurdistan in late 80s, Palestine, etc. DeirYassin 15:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

Both of you! Let's talk! Renata 15:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So the title. I agree massacre is not good. Incindent is not good either. January events are way too generic. Let's calmly think of something useful and NPOV. Renata 15:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, New York Times called it "VILNIUS CRACKDOWN." I suggest something like Vilnius events of January 13, 1991. But then again, it was not only Vilnius. Mostly, but not only. Renata 15:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think the current name is ok. In the Lithuanian language it is commonly reffered to as "Sausio įvykiai" (January Events) as well; or it can be "1991 January events" for it to be more distinctive. DeirYassin 15:58, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I support DY here. Our Polish friends have no gripes about styling minor skirmishes the January Uprising or November Uprising, as if these were the only important uprisings in human history. So let the article stay where it is. --Ghirla | talk 16:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Lithuania is small and everyone knows Jan 13. Now here we need to indicate that this is about Lithuania, and mostly Vilnius. I would never look for it under generic January Events. It has to have either Vilnius or Lithuania in the title. Uprising example does not convince me. If Poles did something arguable, it does not mean we have to repeat it, does it :) ? And I remember someone complaining about Temporary capital as being too generic. And, well, it got actually moved.
Side note, I wanted to write this article for a very long time. I did not do it because I could not choose a decent title :) Renata 16:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What about January Events (Lithuania)? --Ghirla | talk 16:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why use () when we have prepositions? :) I prefer natural language titles, i.e. January Events of Lithuania. Renata 16:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And let's be more specific - January 1991 Events of Lithuania. Renata 16:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Might be as you suggest, might be a Lithuanian title Sausio įvykiai (analogy with Ukrainian title for Holodomor), though I wouldn't like such solution much. But, as you have said, it is hard to find a good title - probably impossible to find such a title that would actually be searched for, so most of readers for this article will anyways come from various links rather than direct searches I guess. And we still can create redirects. DeirYassin 22:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"January Events" ("janvāra notikumi") is also a common term in Latvian for both the Vilnius events and the related events in Latvia at the time. Perhaps this article might be expanded to include the latter? --Pēteris Cedriņš 23:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have to say, it is a very neat idea. It is all related. Renata 02:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad you agree -- if nobody objects, I will soon try to add the "January events" here. As this is a subject we share, I want to point to another article that needs a lot of work and should cover all three Baltic States -- Singing Revolution. I rather wonder whether it wouldn't be better to change the title to Baltic Revolution, as in the title of Anatol Lieven's well-known book. To avoid too much overlap, an expanded article could focus on what was done through cooperation, comparisons and contrasts, aftermath (e.g., the Baltic Assembly [1], which doesn't even have an article...). --Pēteris Cedriņš 03:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that a couple of demonstrations may be termed a revolution. Don't be ridiculous, such a title would only spawn move wars. --Ghirla | talk 09:59, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, revolution means such a change of government when policies are completely reversed, which was the case in the Baltic States at the time. And after all we have Orange Revolution, Rose Revolution and such articles - those revolutions were also similar. DeirYassin 10:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The definition of revolution is rather broad, and the Singing Revolution is already included in the list of "Eastern European anti-Communist/anti-dictatorship revolutions"; it very obviously consisted of much more than "a couple of demonstrations" and was a major factor in the collapse of the USSR. It's my impression that the once popular descriptive term "Singing Revolution" is falling out of use, whilst Lieven's (dated and somewhat tendentious) book has become something of a standard text on the subject -- see, for example Google Scholar. "Singing Revolution" brings up many relevant results, too, but it can also be mistaken for a musical term... --Pēteris Cedriņš 12:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, "Singing Revolution", "Dancing Revolution", "Laughing Revolution", "Orange Revolution", "Banana Revolution"... People who use these terms have very limited understanding of what revolution is all about. Even "rising" or "uprising" (like January Uprising and November Uprising) is a more appropriate term in the context. --Ghirla | talk 12:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And I think of these "revolutions" as having a sense of humor. Singing revolution is a very common term, not that much in Lithuania, but Estonia. I don't know if it is becoming less used. Renata 13:27, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request[edit]

Speaks for itself. Thank you.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:11, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality disputed (recommended)[edit]

Looking at the article, I just cannot say that it is written in a neutral way. It is definitely very biased. I would recommend putting "Neutrality is disputed" banner at the top of the page. In addition, "January events" should be a disambiguation page. There have been awfully lot of events happened on January. This event is not the only one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimacq (talk • contribs) 1 August 2007


Agree with this report, at least we need to cite some controversies from former Defense Minister of Lithuania A. Butkyavichus:

F.e. you can see controversy it in Russian Wiki: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B2_%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8E%D1%81%D0%B5_%281991%29#cite_note-9 I don't know who is right here, but there is no good in ignoring that claims:

In the materials of a series of interviews weekly "Obzor" for April-July 2000 [16], former Defense Minister of Lithuania A. Butkyavichus speaks to them and preparing provocations V. Landsbergis, a wider Sajudis, a KGB agent in its ranks.

Here is Russian news where Butkyavichus speaks about this event as a well planned action with predictable results. http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1369522.html

Using translate.google.com

  • Speaking April 14, 2000 in the Russian weekly television program "Week", Petkyavichyus said that "from the roofs of neighboring houses to the assembled crowd in the tower shot our" savanorisy "(translated from Lithuanian - Volunteers - IA REGNUM). This completely refutes the official version, according to which the January 13, 1991 Lithuanian citizens in the tower were killed by the bullets of troops of the Soviet Army and the collision of the Soviet armored vehicles. But the Lithuanian justice once again did not hear that statement.
  • Lithuanian investigators also chose not to notice published in a 2003 book Pyatkyavichusa "Ship of Fools." It was written: "The conscience of Landsbergis and A. Butkyavichusa victim nights thirteenth day of January, as one came up and ordered another several dozen guards were dressed and kept out of the TV tower. It was they who fired down into the crowd ... I am with my own eyes seen when near my feet from the asphalt ricocheting bullets bounced off. " (P. 78).
  • In an interview on "review" (14. 10. 2002) Petkyavichus told how he found out that people in the tower shot Lithuanian border guards. It turns out in 1993, all 18 guards came to the Diet to Petkyavichyusu complaining about the fact that they have deleted from the lists of participants in the events of January 13. "They told me that their boss Chesnulyavichus with a gun in his hand to put all the wall and said that if they are at least one word hint that they were on the TV tower - with them it is finished!" Ytro.ru
  • There are also other evidence to support the involvement of militants Sajudis "to the January death of the victims. So, at the time of court hearing the case of the former leader of "Unity" Ivanov, in a criminal case there was testimony that, for almost an hour until a television tower near the Soviet paratroopers, in the darkness under the bushes "were lying on the ground the bodies of men .
  • We also know that in 1 hour and 10 minutes the night on Jan. 13, 1991 from the windows of the building of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania Algimantas Kane priest began serving Mass for the victims of the Soviet army, starting it with the words: "They are the first sacrifices". At the same time, we know that the column with the paratroopers emerged from the tower at 1:00. 50 min. On the first victim was known in only 2 hours and 30 minutes. " *

50.53.48.197 (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support meetings[edit]

During the following day, meetings of support took place in many cities (Kiev, Riga, Tallinn). The meeting in Riga was scheduled on 12 January, before attack on TV Tower, to support Latvian governmet, while I haven't learned if the theme of demonstration was or not fully changed, this sentence should be reworded otherwise it implies that this was spontaneous act of support ---- Xil/talk 19:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and/or integrate very differently[edit]

In my view, January 1991 events in Latvia and this article should be merged. They're inextricably linked. --Pēteris Cedriņš (talk) 17:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for clarification about Vilnius TV tower[edit]

Was the Vilnius TV tower ever occupied during the events? If so, when and by whom? --Bensin (talk) 10:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on January Events (Lithuania). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate information about CIA involvement.[edit]

104.174.104.144 (talk) 19:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)The CIA was not associated with Rita Dapkute or Andrew Eiva. The Baltic Times interviewed Rita Dapkute and she clarified that there was no CIA involvement at all. The Soviet Union is also known for spreading propaganda and it would make sense because they didn't want to make seem like they were beat by the citizens of a small country>104.174.104.144 (talk) 19:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 May 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. There is no consensus that this topic is WP:PRIMARY for "January Events", so it should stay at the disambiguated location. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 05:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


January Events (Lithuania) → January Events – Originally at January Events, moved to January Events (Lithuania) in 2009 to distinguish from January 1991 events in Latvia. That distinction is unnecessary now as the latter article has been moved to The Barricades. This should be moved back to the plain title. JIP | Talk 09:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate While in Lithuania January Events can be refer to an revolution in the country to take out the Soviet troops, it is not well known outside the world when the word in English can be refer to any events and observance that taken place in a month. So my best suggestion is DAB or redirect the proposed title to January#January observance. 110.137.160.152 (talk) 11:08, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per argument above. It is clear example that "January Events" has been known in Lithuania as an revolution, but not elsewhere in the world. 182.1.48.13 (talk) 06:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:13, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:39, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet losses[edit]

In the infobox it says that there were some Soviet losses, but there are no sources to them, so shouldn’t be the Soviet losses change to none? And also, this could be biased but, no Lithuanian source or documentation cites that there was a Soviet loss. AdmiralDoorKnob (talk) 11:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Soviet death was Viktor Viktorovich Shatskikh, who was shot by another Soviet soldier. I don't think anyone disputes this, and there are plenty of sources that can be used to back this up. You asked for a Lithuanian source, so here is one from the Seimas website. 98.170.164.88 (talk) 02:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:January_Events&oldid=1207794431"