This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
content of the article is being continuously removed with no explanation
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Smarttbutt (talk • contribs) 19:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is a WP:CONTENTDISPUTE which should be handled using the dispute strategies listed there, rather than as a COI edit request. Needless to say, the prose used in the claims which are being removed leave a lot to be desired (e.g., "In 2004, in response to new charges, an Administrative Law Judge made a convoluted ruling that included both positive and negative findings"). Perhaps if this section of text were to be improved, it would more easily solicit support from editors, and thus stand a better chance of remaining in the article.[a] Regards, Spintendo 22:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Notes
^It's not easy to argue for the inclusion of text in an article which is poorly-worded, no matter how factual the information behind that problematic text may be.
