Talk:Ip Man (film)/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 02:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC) My first film (GA) review will come soon. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prior review[edit]

I first wanted to address the fact that it seems every concern outlined in the previous review has been allayed, most notably the extensive reference restructuring. Now, onto the present state of the article...

Lead and infobox[edit]

Both are informative, and summarize the article suitably.

Plot and Cast[edit]

As I said earlier, this is my first cinematic GA review. Thus, I have learned that plots don't need references. However, it seems on every GA-level film article, there are references within the casting section. You will need to adduce this section as such. One all-encompassing reference might work, or you could reference each individual cast member.

Production[edit]

I will need references for each crew member mentioned in the first two paragraphs, just as in the casting section.
"However, the studio producing the film closed, and the project was abandoned." What studio was this?
"Apart from historical references, Mak also created a glass house in the factory." What does this mean exactly? I would assume that this glass factory was used in the creation of props? Or otherwise?
You mention Hung's praise in the last paragraph. Could you adduce it?

Film title controversy[edit]

Interesting trivia.

Release[edit]

I have altered the ebb and flow of the Box Office subsection.

Accolades and Sequels[edit]

Both pass.

Conclusion[edit]

I am exulted I will be able to pass my first cinematic GA review, once these few issues are mitigated. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 22:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question Hi, Qatar Stars League I have a few questions regarding your review. In the "Film title controversy" section what you mean by "Interesting trivia" are you just stating that it is Interesting trivia or do you want the section renamed to Interesting trivia? Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 16:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again I think covered everything in your review please let me know if anything else needs to be done. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 17:44, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, you have. Excellent work! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]