Talk:Ip Man (film)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be doing a review for this film shortly. It's playing at my local theater and after I go see it, i'll continue with the review. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've started reviewing the article. The prose is generally strong so far but I have some questions regarding sources. wu-jing.org seems to be a fan site. Can you find proof of this website being a reliable source? Same for kungfucinema.com. Cite 21b does not mention what it claims to be citing. Cites 47, 48 and 49 need accessdates at least. Cites to http://www.ipman-movie.com/blog/?cat=5 seem to be broken.

I'll go forth with the review more thoroughly after the wu-jing.com as a resource is ok'd. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's 04 September now, over a month since the review began. Maybe someone else should review this, getting it out the way.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 14:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To offer an opinion on the source, the website wu-jing.org calls itself a "fansite dedicated to wu jing and martial arts films" which does not sounds like it's reliable. Ergo, unless sourcing can be fixed soon, the article should be failed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to agree. There has not been any way new updates to this that I've seen to undo the wu jing cites, so I don't know if I can mark this further. If it's not updated at all to fix this by Friday, I'm going to fail this article for now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing's been changed, at all. Shouldn't it be removed now?RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 21:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, at this point nothing's going to change, so I'm failing the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]