Talk:International Gilbert and Sullivan Festival

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality issues[edit]

Another editor has added:

At the first Festival (1994), First Prize was awarded to the production of Utopia Limited presented by the Gilbert & Sullivan Society of Hancock County (Maine, USA), under the direction of Dede Johnson.

This is literally true, but gives undue importance to the Hancock County society's early win. One could as easily point out the Derby G&S Society's dominance of the awards in recent years. If we're going to mention award winners, it should be from a broader perspective. Marc Shepherd 17:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. But the wiki is a WIP; and as an old equity draughtsman, I suggest that, to redress the imbalance, someone should contribute mentions of Derby and other worthy honorees. --TheMaestro
I added a reference to Derby and tried to add a little "broader perspective" and also replace out words like "ideal", but feel free to continue to re-write. I removed the POV tag. I don't think there's a neutrality issue here (no one is pushing one winner over another), just a question of what examples to include that will give a well-rounded description of the Festival. --Ssilvers 16:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very helpful. Thanks for your contribution. (I also rearranged these comments to put them in chronological order.) TheMaestro 17:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the revision is much better. There is very little doubt in my mind that the prior edit was put in by someone with a "Hancock County" agenda. Marc Shepherd 01:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The dreaded '"Hancock Country" agenda'!! I can't help but notice that the person responsible for the "prior edit" is also the one who suggested that an addition like Ss's be made, and then thanked him for making it. If that person has an agenda, he or she is serving it ill, and I hope that the full wrath of Hancock County is visited upon him or her. I also hope it is only in my imagination that some people are taking this very seriously.TheMaestro 01:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

Re-assessed as the new "C" class. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on International Gilbert and Sullivan Festival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:International_Gilbert_and_Sullivan_Festival&oldid=1207726049"