Talk:Ink cartridge

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Semiprotection[edit]

Why was semi-protection policy removed? This article gets A LOT of spam. While it was under semi-protection, it didn't get any spam. I believe it should be semi-protected again.--Lenilucho 01:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article has never been semi-protected. Applying the template does not apply protection. If you want this article protected either contact an administrator or list the article at WP:RPP. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 01:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didn't know how this works. I added it on the list and it was denied. I just added a note on the external links section. We'll se if it works. Thank you.--Lenilucho 07:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a thought, this article doesn't need semi-protection... protection is usually only granted for very hot topics that have constant revert wars and vandalisms. If all topics like these get semi protected, then wiki would not be so much of a wiki anymore since no one other then members can edit it.--Steven 15:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be more appropriate to require people to sign up than protect almost every article, though your assertion that it wouldn't be a wiki anymore is flawed - many existing wikis require people to sign up. Richard001 08:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal collusion and price fixing category[edit]

Need something on the pricing and collusiong of ink cartridges. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericg33 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

End bit[edit]

Very lazy of me to complain and run, but the end of the article could do with some editing for style (the numbered list bit is more of an 'Did You Know' than an encyclopaedia article). GBM (talk) 10:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC) Also the "near you!". End bit needs to be changed. -Ottoo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.245.36.123 (talk) 03:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect or misleading Environmental Impact section[edit]

Specifically the following statement: 'Each cartridge becomes 3.5 pounds of solid waste sitting in a landfill and can take up to 450 to 1000 years to decompose' It might be true for laser printers and some inkjets, but the cartridges for home printers tend to be much lighter than the suggested 3.5 lbs. As an example, Walmart lists the 'HP 60 Black Inkjet Cartridge (CC640WN)' as 0.13 lbs (when full). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nm160111 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of the in-cartridge sponge[edit]

Do you know of any good explanation for the purpose of the sponge in the cartridge that are common in modern inkjet cartridges? The Yahoo! Answers question about this issue is the only thing I found online related to this quesstion and it mainly describes the two points:

improving steady ink flow and preventing leakage esp. in case of a nozzle failure
retaining a certain portion of ink absorbed in the sponge so that ink manufacturers maximize sales while misleadingly declaring a greater content

--Yuwash (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ink cartridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]