Talk:Implenia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Implenia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100529224525/http://www.transco-sedrun.ch/1_DEU_HTML.htm to http://www.transco-sedrun.ch/1_DEU_HTML.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello everybody,

This is the webmaster of Implenia writing. We used to update our Wikipedia article in German only so far. But since we've been growing considerably as a company, we want to keep track of our articles in English and French as well.

So we've translated the (approved) article from German. Of course we are aware that this is an encyclopedia and not an advertisment/PR platform. Therefore we've used a very neutral language to describe the company (as in the German original). I hope that's okay for you guys.

So I'll post the proposed article right here. It would be great if any of the etitors could go through it and tell me if I can update the current article.

Thanks in advance, Implenia-ag (talk) 16:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC) (Redacted) Hi - Large sections of the above text are missing citations from independent sources as required by WP:CITE. Also it is missing the information on historic projects included in the current article. And the Areas of business section reads far too much like an advert for the company. It seems to me that it is largely written from company sources rather than independent sources so it needs quite a bit more work. Sorry. Dormskirk (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Dormskirk, Thank you for your reply. I have used as many external articles as possible - especially for the history section where they are available.

Implenia is growing very fast at the moment. Hence, the company's structure is changing very often these times - about twice or more a year. That is why there are (to my knowledge) no up-to-date sources available; except on the company's website. Furthermore, I would be very grateful if you could tell me which parts of the text "smells" too much like PR, I will gladly rephrase them. (Note: I have already deleted all the unncecessary adjectives; see above)

Thank you for the hint about the historic projects, I have included that part again.

I probably should mention again that I am acting as the webmaster of this firm. As such, I am responsible for the accuracy of this Wiki article. But I really want to stress that it is not our goal to use Wikipedia as a PR platform, we simply want to provide your users who are looking up this article with accurate / up-to-date information. Today's article is hopelessly outdated and in many cases just plain wrong.

Thank you in advance for pointing me in the right direction. Implenia-ag (talk) 14:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi - The article on Bechtel is an excellent example of a really well written article on a construction company: you will see that it is very well drafted, that all information is properly cited and that independent sources are used throughout. The whole of your section on "Areas of business" reads like PR: it reads as if it could have come from the company's website, which would be entirely inappropriate for a wikipedia article. I hope this helps. Dormskirk (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)