Talk:Ike Dike

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Initial article[edit]

Folks, this topic seemed interesting enough to at least merit creating a stub article as a placeholder for links from other articles. If this proposal goes somewhere then the topic will merit a full-fledged article. If not it will probably make sense to delete the article.

I have no plans of expanding this further myself in the immediate future nor trying to raise the quality of the article unless there is something glaringly wrong. Feel free to improve it if you are so inclined.

We'll see what Texas and the Feds ultimately decide ...

--Mcorazao (talk) 22:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updating Article[edit]

I noticed this article lacks working URLs and proper references. I am a local citizen and highly interested in this topic. I will proceed with updating this article. Style improvements are more than welcome.

Progress: Updating and fixing URLs to newspapers articles, removing pay-wall article references.

Atexian (talk) 21:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ike Dike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Unclear on costs?[edit]

In the article there is a reference to costs being "as high as 2 or 3 billion" and then later cost estimates of $26-32 billion -- in context it is unclear (and the implication was the $2-3b was too much, but $26-32b are worth consideration now...). Was the original $2-3b for something substantially different, or an error? Ryan (talk) 18:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]