Talk:Hurricane Jimena (2009)/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 01:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"$97.5 million" MXN$ or US$? You need to indicate this for every $ figure from here on in.
- USD. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"El Imparcial" or "Elimparcial"? Is it a newspaper? If yes, it should be italicised.
- It is the second one. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"off Mexico's Pacific Coast" Coast shouldn't be italised.
- It was never italicized. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Coast shouldn't be capitalised. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 23:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Two days after developing" --> "Two days after the start of development"?
- No need for the start, but otherwise switched it to "development".Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 15:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"NHC" should come after the first mention of "National Hurricane Center", and thereafter should only be mentioned as "NHC".'
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"becoming a major hurricane" how's a major hurricane different from a "regular" one?
- A storm winds winds of 111 mph or higher. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Jimena ~~weakened back to a~~ returned to tropical storm status over land"
- Done.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"brownout reduced visibility by 1/4" what's a brownout and 1/4?
- - It is a SW US term, I wikilinked it. 1/4 is 25%.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Two powerlines also fell ~~down~~" try "fell up".
- Changed, but I don't like the new wording. 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
"upgraded into Category 2"
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The The United" duplication
- Epic fail by me.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"180 vulnerable families" what role does vulnerable play?
- Removed it.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
According to Checklinks, there are four dead links.
- Fixed them. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still one dead link. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 23:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FN 1 it's either "Pronounce Names" or "Pornouncenames.com"
- The second one. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FN 5 check formatting.
- Ugh, I hate this. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
standardise date style.
- On the NCDC links, the date is not known, so I include the year, but fixed the rest.YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Issue not fixed – I see both DMY and YMD styles. Plus I don't think "Staff Writer" is really needed for the refs (of course someone has to write it!) Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 10:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - I think I fixed it (agian), I put "Staff Writer" on there for consistency with other articles. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very happy with the article; it meets all evert GA criterion. I hope to see this page at FAC. Until then, have fun! Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 06:17, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]