Talk:How to Destroy Angels (Coil EP)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name Shuffle[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How to Destroy Angels (EP)How to Destroy Angels (single) — The Coil article is about a single, and the How to Destroy Angels article is about an EP. Relisted. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC) –Cosmopolitan (talk) 06:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Wikipedia articles are about the songs themselves, not the singles they appeared on, hence How to Destroy Angels (song) would probably be better. --Prosperosity (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Few singles are 16 minutes long by definition. An EP classification is appropriate and both review sites note that it is an EP, thus sourcing it as such. How about moving it to How to Destroy Angels (Coil EP)? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 19:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    It's a song. A single song. Thus the classification of "Single". I would not oppose the suggestion made above for the title of "... (song)", but really (song) and (single) are saying the same thing, so both of those work. But this is not an EP, even according to modest literal definitions: longer than a single, but shorter than an LP. Single songs over 10 minutes are historically anything but unusual. –Cosmopolitan (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on How to Destroy Angels (Coil EP). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]