Talk:Honour of Clitheroe

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I will begin work editing and adding to this page from 1 April.

Manorial (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trappedinburnley, I think this is beginning to look useful. Thanks for all your help.

Manorial (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Is there any reason why this article is titled 'Honor of Clitheroe' rather than the more conventional British English 'Honour of Clitheroe'? The latter is more in keeping with the parent article Honour (feudal land tenure), and articles on the individual Honours, Honour of Grafton, Honour of Lancaster, Honour of Peverel, Honour of Wallingford, and Honour of Richmond. The term 'Honour of Clitheroe' is twice as prevalent on google books than 'Honor of Clitheroe', which would suggest this should be the title per WP:COMMONNAME. I would be bold and move this myself, but I thought I would post this here in case someone wanted to put forward an argument for the existing name. Benea (talk) 10:30, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't think of a reason why the 'u' is omitted, but then I've not edited the article. I turned to the Victoria County History for answers, but it isn't especially clear. The section on Clitheroe from volume 6 for the County of Lancaster uses "honor" [1], but then other mentions such as this one in volume 4 use "honour". The search results for "honour" [2] turn up 148 pages and "honor" 95 [3]. I would think that the variance is because either is considered acceptable, but Wikipedia has the opportunity to introduce some inter-article consistency, so I support moving this article to Honour of Clitheroe. Nev1 (talk) 12:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I have been involved with this article I can’t offer much insight into why we expanded is redirect over the other. Mainly it was because the handful of existing links pointed to it. It is my understanding the spelling was traditionally interchangeable and is technically still correct today, if unconventional. I don’t have a problem with moving it, however just incase you decide not to, I'm going to re-point Honour of Clitheroe here (So I don't forget again). --Trappedinburnley (talk) 20:38, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given that everyone is in favour of the move, I've tagged the redirect Honour of Clitheroe for deletion to clear the way for the move of this article. Once this has been done a note can be added to the article if desired to explain that 'Honor' is an alternative variant used historically. Benea (talk) 23:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Honour of Clitheroe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711021334/http://www.forestofbowland.com/files/uploads/MartinsBlog/ESC%20SPEC%20WITH%20CORRECTIONS.pdf to http://www.forestofbowland.com/files/uploads/MartinsBlog/ESC%20SPEC%20WITH%20CORRECTIONS.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Honour of Clitheroe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120313172005/http://www.towneley.org.uk/downloads/TTv4_web.pdf to http://www.towneley.org.uk/downloads/TTv4_web.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]