Talk:History of coffee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article needs to be restructured and improved[edit]

This article title is "History of Coffee" but there are several sections that have nothing to do with history. Then, there's a whole section of the article titled "History". So does that section deal with the history of the history of coffee, or just the history of coffee?

This article needs major clean up and rebuilding. The sections on genetics and etymology are inappropriate and off topic. The section on production is also inappropriate and any relevant discussion there should be incorporated into the article. The current structure--breaking the subject up into geographic subheadings--is misguided at best as it does not actually present the HISTORY of coffee and instead gives the reader a treatment of coffee traditions by global region. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:B078:6C00:15E6:C447:EB05:789D (talk) 10:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 18 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tave0111.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shadooper. Peer reviewers: KanishkC1998, Jovi KB.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14th or 15th century[edit]

The article contained two contradictory statements. One (which I have deleted, as the source doesn't weigh compared to the other):

  • It may have been first cultivated by Arabs in the 14th century

Two:

  • The earliest credible evidence of either coffee drinking or knowledge of the coffee tree appears in the middle of the 15th century, in the Sufi monasteries of the Yemen in southern Arabia.

I want to note that both refer to Arabs/Arabia. Therefore, which one is correct? --92slim (talk) 12:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Coffee tree was already common in Ethiopia possibly used as a traditional herbal medicine, Imam Muhammad Ibn Said Al Dhobhani was the first to make a drink of the coffee beans. He continued to bring those beans from Ethiopia as part of his trade, cultivation became organized in Yemen around the 16th century. The Ottomans & later Italians played a major role in its spread outside of Yemen, The reason the coffee drink made it way much later into Ethiopia is mainly because of the Christian Clergy resistance to the "Sufi Muslim Drink", eventually it was legalized in the times of Menelik. The Coffee tradition of Ethiopia still retains the 19th century Sufi Islamic count (Awal, Thanwa & Baraka) Lubestonic (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Things to Add to Article[edit]

Coffee is very important to Latin America, therefore coffee has impacted Latin America greatly. I would like to add that during WWII Latin America lost 40% of its export business and therefore was on the verge of economic collapse. Also buy the end of WWII the United States was consuming was much coffee as the rest of the world was before the war. Another impact coffee had on Latin America was causing those countries to no longer just be considered imperialized countries, but countries with their own goals and intents. I will add the necessary sources when I put this on the page. Source: Williamson, W. F. "The Place of Coffee in Trade with Latin America." Journal of Marketing 6, no. 4 (April 2, 1942): 149-151. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed September 30, 2017). Shadooper (talk) 18:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Something also to mention would be the effect specialized coffee has had on the market value of coffee beans. With lattes and frappuccinos becoming more popular this has caused coffee houses to be able to use cheaper coffee beans in their coffee. Another affect is people buy less coffee since they already pay three or four dollars for one cup. All of this together has caused the price of the coffee bean to go down and therefore effecting certain Latin American countries' economy. Source: Scholer, Morten. "Bitter or Better Future for Coffee Producers?" International Trade Forum no. 2 (June 2004): 9-12. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed October 1, 2017).. Shadooper (talk) 18:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guatemala started producing coffee in the 1500s and Guatemala lacked the man-power to harvest all of the coffee beans. As a result the Guatemalan government forced the indigenous to work on the fields. This lead to a strain in the indigenous and Guatemalan people's relationship. Source: McCreery, David. “Coffee and Indigenous Labor in Guatemala, 1871-1980.” In The Global Coffee Economy in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1500-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.192-208.Shadooper (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fairtrade coffee is the idea of paying the growers directly and "cutting out" the middle men. Some Latin American coffee growers do not have a lot of money and struggle to make an income, so Fairtrade coffee should increase the income the growers receive. There are mixed opinions of the effectiveness of Fairtrade. There is a lot of information on Fairtrade coffee should I make a new heading about Fairtrade coffee? Possible Source: James, Deborah. "Justice and Java." NACLA Report on the Americas 34, no. 2 (September 2000): 11-12. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed September 30, 2017). “Fairtrade is not fair,” YouTube Video, 09:33, Why Fair Trade is Bad on December 01, 2009, posted by “Peter Griffiths,” October 5, 2017. Johannessen, Silje, and Harold Wilhite. "Who Really Benefits from Fairtrade? An Analysis of Value Distribution in Fairtrade Coffee." Globalizations 7, no. 4 (December 2010): 525-544. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed October 5, 2017). “Santiago’s Story,” YouTube Video, 06:18, First Hand Account on March 26, 2008, posted by “Fair Trade Certified,” October 1, 2017, Shadooper (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources: “Fairtrade is not fair,” YouTube Video, 09:33, Why Fair Trade is Bad on December 01, 2009, posted by “Peter Griffiths,” October 5, 2017. McCreery, David. “Coffee and Indigenous Labor in Guatemala, 1871-1980.” In The Global Coffee Economy in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1500-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.192-208. <refMcCreery, David. “Coffee and Indigenous Labor in Guatemala, 1871-1980.” In The Global Coffee Economy in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1500-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.192-208.> James, Deborah. "Justice and Java." NACLA Report on the Americas 34, no. 2 (September 2000): 11-12. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed September 30, 2017). Johannessen, Silje, and Harold Wilhite. "Who Really Benefits from Fairtrade? An Analysis of Value Distribution in Fairtrade Coffee." Globalizations 7, no. 4 (December 2010): 525-544. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed October 5, 2017). “Santiago’s Story,” YouTube Video, 06:18, First Hand Account on March 26, 2008, posted by “Fair Trade Certified,” October 1, 2017, Scholer, Morten. "Bitter or Better Future for Coffee Producers?" International Trade Forum no. 2 (June 2004): 9-12. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed October 1, 2017). Topik, Steven C. "Coffee Anyone? Recent Research on Latin American Coffee Societies." Hispanic American Historical Review 80, no. 2 (May 2000): 225-266. Humanities International Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed September 27, 2017). Williamson, W. F. "The Place of Coffee in Trade with Latin America." Journal of Marketing 6, no. 4 (April 2, 1942): 149-151. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost Shadooper (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on History of coffee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kyrsten's Peer Review[edit]

Your sentence phrasing is awkward and a bit repetitive. You tend to say the same thing twice in a sentence. I think you also don't do a good job and combining two ideas/thoughts. I got lost a few times in the paragraphs. You should expand on some novel/key words. Ex: Fairtrade. The reader (like me) may not know what that is so I think you should expand on it or provide a citation of a definition. Overall, work on making your article flow better, right now its a little awkward. (but this is just a rough draft) I do think you have great academic sources and an interesting topic. You also do a great job and providing the citation after your paragraphs. I think you have a lot of points of view from the LatinJovi KB (talk) 17:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC) American perspective so make sure you also show evidence from the opposing perspective to stray from bias.[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of coffee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mocha or Mecca?[edit]

Greetings. Some recent edits to this page by an IP changed Mocha to Mecca, and the most recent one changed it back to Mocha, which I reverted. But seeing this page's history, I have to wonder if Mocha is an actual place? Zanygenius(talk to me!)(email me!) 19:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you shouldn't be making changes if you have to ask other people after the fact whether your change was correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:B078:6C00:15E6:C447:EB05:789D (talk) 10:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mocha Coffee is related to the Mocha of Mofar in modern Yemen, the native port of the Sufi imam of Muhammad Ibn Said Al Dhobhani. The Coffee drink eventually made its way into Mecca a century after it was invented.

The Italian Mocha is derived from the modern Yemeni Arabic name of the port (Mofarite: Am-Makhan, Medieval Yemeni-Arabic: Al-Makhhan, Modern Yemeni Arabic Al-Makhah) Both Mecca & Mocha share a common older etymology, relating to Al-Muqh of the Sabaeans, the Temple of the Moon sect that imposed their religion on Mofar & the rest of South Arabia in Pre-Islamic times. The Cubic Crescent temples of the moon were built wherever the Sabaean sphere of influence reached from Mecca to Axum, a cultural influence that continued by Lunar Semitic kingdoms up until the conversion of the Axumites to Christianity & the Himyarites to Judaism. Lubestonic (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Except pre-islamic Mecca was called بكة (bakkah) which means 'narrow' likely referring to Mecca tight valley surrounded by mountains. An example used as evidence by Arabic lexicologists is the verse in the old testament (Book of Psalms Chapter 84) which mentions עמק הבכא 'Emek Ha-Bakha'. Furthermore Mecca was settled (and in the sphere of influence) by Central Arabs who had a culture and religion that differed from the South Arabian Semitic civilizations in Yemen. Pre-islamic Mecca was a place of worship for the North Arabian three dities (Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat) the Triad likely influenced by the Hellenic-Roman world and culture since Mecca was an important node along the incense road connecting Yemen and trade from India and East Africa with the Roman Empire in the Levant. Oud, Frankincense, Myrrh, and Ivory flowed through Mecca on camel back. A Contemporary Nomad (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Embellishments[edit]

"In the Philippines, coffee has a history as rich as its flavor." Really? 😂 This must be plagiarism, or it's just not proper encyclopedic writing style. Worldbook1967 (talk) 00:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies.[edit]

This article needs to be removed until it is seriously revisited due to, on the one hand, too much misinformation (….arabe trade as introducer of chocolate in Europe, etc....) as well as too many omissions of most important chapters of the history of coffee,,,.i.e. Why the U.S. is a coffee drinking nation instead of tea, like the vast majority of formerly British possessions....To ignore the pivotal role that the West Indies played in establishing coffee as the main beverage in the Americas is unforgivable…. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 52.119.87.49 (talk) 00:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries suggests that the first Coffee House in England was in Oxford, not London. RossTooke (talk) 02:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Random, unrelated sentence[edit]

"The banning of women from coffeehouses was not universal, for example, women frequented them in Germany, but it appears to have been commonplace elsewhere in Europe, including in England.[45]". The banning was not universal? What banning? No banning has been mentioned in that section of the article.

Amandajm (talk) 00:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Coffee In the Islamicate Empires into History of coffee[edit]

Much of the article can be covered in History of coffee and coffeehouses, and the concept of "coffee in the Islamicate empires" is not defined anywhere in the sources. JoelleJay (talk) 02:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 08:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason of removal[edit]

1) I removed mention of Leonhard in the England subheading - my source of Cowan (2008) doesnt state Leonhard's 1583 account mentioning anything about England, I checked the source that was previously cited in the text [Wood (2013)] and still cant find any mention of the Levant Company related to this event. Also a better more accurate description of Leonhard is already in the article elsewhere.

2) WP:OVERKILL. I removed the 4 citations on Charles II's attempt to crush coffee houses, despite having 4 citations on a short sentence, most need a subcription to read it, the few that can be freely read doesn't impart the exact message of the written content, so I added my own citation (with free verifiable links).

Danial Bass (talk) 19:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

al-Dhabhani and a possibly inaccurate reference[edit]

In the History section, the second sentence: "Sufi Imam Muhammad Ibn Said Al Dhabhani is known to have imported goods from Ethiopia to Yemen" is linked to Weinberg & Bealer 2001, p. 3-4. However, a thorough read of these pages as well as a search for all references to al-Dhabhani within that book reveals no mention of his ever having "imported goods" from Ethiopia to Yemen. Can anyone provide a correct reference for this statement, or clarify what is meant here? If the intention is to establish that al-Dhabhani might have brought some coffee cherries back with him on his return to Aden, then I think that hardly constitutes "imported goods". Please clarify. Clearfire (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduced to Europe in 15th century in Hungary?[edit]

Is everyone ignoring the existence of the Balkans, where people made coffee once the Ottomans conquered the region?

People in the Balkans are Europeans, so coffee has been in Europe far, far longer than the Turkish invasion of Hungary. Lumosnight (talk) 09:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_coffee&oldid=1212528126"