Talk:Heracleum (plant)

Redirect added[edit]

I created Golpar as redirect to this article in accord with Iranica's identification of Golpar with Heracleum [1]. If there is a more specific article please feel to change the redirect. I may also use that source to add information about the use of golpar in Persian food. The Behnam 04:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect was subsequently changed to Heracleum persicum. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

I moved the page from "Hogweed" to "Heracleum (plant)". (Heracleum is a disambiguation page.) My reasons were:

WP:Plants policy is to prefer the scientific name unless there are very good reasons to the contrary (e.g. it's the name of a common food).
"Hogweed" is not part of the common name of all species of Heracleum. Common names for white umbellifers (which are easily confused) are very variable (e.g. whereas in most parts of England H. sphondylium seems to be called "hogweed", in others it is called "cow parsley", which is elsewhere the name for Anthriscus sylvestris).
It is particularly important to be very precise about the identification of white umbellifers, since some are highly poisonous (e.g. hemlock), some are irritants (e.g. giant hogweed), whereas others are edible. Using common names carries a greater risk of confusion than using scientific names.

Peter coxhead (talk) 16:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Heracleum (plant). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040820121205/http://www.itis.usda.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=29669 to http://www.itis.usda.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=29669

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Common Names[edit]

Both Heracleum sphondylium and Heracleum maximum are referred to as cow parsnip in the literature. Now I see that Heracleum sibiricum is referred to cow parsnip as well. This makes it difficult to write about these species in the same article or paper.

I've seen the common names European cow-parsnip and American cow-parsnip for H. sphondylium and H. maximum (resp.) but I have not seen a common name for H. sibiricum (although I may be missing something). Let me propose the obvious set of common names:

Heracleum sphondylium, European cow parsnip
Heracleum maximum, American cow parsnip (as in "North America")
Heracleum sibiricum, Siberian cow parsnip

If the context is understood, the unqualified name cow parsnip will suffice of course, and so the above naming scheme shouldn't break current usage.

Thoughts?

Tom Scavo (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the universal problem of using common names. Provided articles are at their scientific names, common names can then be redirects or disambig pages. Redirects where that is a unequivocal unique common name for a species, and a disambig where one common name may reference several species. Where several common names reference a single species, that is always dealt with within the relevant article. Referring to species in article and papers is done by a link to the article3 name which should always be the scientific name (except for a very few food and similar plants where common name trumps scientific name such as Carrot, Parsnip or Potato). I think that it is wholly wrong for editors in Wikipedia to propose common names to use in articles. Common names can only be names in common usage and not what Wikipedia has decided should be common names. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was expecting that reply, and I agree, but please see the bulleted list in section "Similar species" in the Heracleum mantegazzianum topic. There the common name cow parsnip refers to three different species (and, no, I didn't make that up). What to do in a case like that? Tom Scavo (talk) 19:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that going back to reputable sources might resolve at least some of these issues. As an example, Stace only lists "Hogweed" as a common name for H. sphondylium and that is the only common name that I know for it - the others may be misunderstandings, misidentification or pure fabrication. As a start, if we removed all common names that wren't sourced and not in the three most reputable floras of the particular country/ Area, that might be a start. I can do UK and Ireland (and thus Europe since there are almost no other English common names elsewhere in Europe) but I can't pretend to be able to identify the best US or Canadian sources. Thankfully there is little carry-over to NZ and Australia , and where it does occur, names from the old country still tend to be retained. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not long ago, Heracleum sibiricum and Heracleum maximum were known as Heracleum sphondylium ssp. sibiricum and Heracleum sphondylium var. lanatum (which means the literature is filled with "ghost" species, btw), so it's not surprising that all three species are known as cow parsnip. The solution to this conundrum is not in the past, I'm afraid. Tom Scavo (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Biennial species?[edit]

The introduction to this article claims that "Heracleum is a genus...of biennial and perennial herbs" but I can find no evidence of a biennial species in the genus. Am I missing something? Thanks in advance. Tom Scavo (talk) 12:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]