Talk:Hector Sants

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Iran controversy[edit]

(Redacted)

I have redacted the above discussion. The sources presented re Iran do not support the inclusion of this text in an article about Mr. Sants; I have no opinion on whether they may be appropriate in Credit Suisse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), here they represent a novel synthesis from published sources and are also potentially defamatory. There have been complaints to the Wikimedia Foundation about this (see WP:OTRS). It would be unwise in the extreme to continue to use this article or its talk page as a platform for this discussion. Guy (Help!) 18:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The controversies section is surely inappropriate for the content now listed (Select committee inquiry into FSA). It would be much better to just add that bit to the career section under the FSA sub-heading. E. Fokker (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Removed controversies section. This is blatant and open censorship. It goes against everything Wikipedia should stand for. Shame on you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.198.239 (talk) 12:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay controversy[edit]

Could we put in a section regarding Hector Sant's pay of £795,192? (source http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/nine-thousand-public-sector-staff-earn-more-than-pm-2084129.html)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.130.207 (talk) 11:50, 23 September 2010

I don't know if it's usual to publish salaries in bio articles. Check Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. A suppose you have to pay that much to get a poacher to turn gamekeeper when poachers are payed so much. (P.S. wouldn't mind being on 5 times PM's salary myself!) AWhiteC (talk) 21:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I don't buy the "poacher turned gamekeeper" argument. But as I don't fancy getting a call from FSA lawyers, I'll say no more for now. In reality, to someone like Sants £795K is petty cash.

References[edit]

Lots of news articles related to Sants

[1]
Trade2tradewell 12:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extraordinary![edit]

The subject of this article was the head of the FSA at the time of some monolithic financial disasters, for which the FSA is held responsible by a large proportion of those who have heard of it. But there is no mention of this whatsoever. I am not asking for opinions! But these are not called for. The purpose of an encyclopaedia is to inform. This article is woefully lacking in relevant information, the importance of which - in this situation - cannot be under-estimated. I'm sure that someone or some people have been editing out such information. I won't use the word "shameful" to describe this. Many, I repeat many, *would* use that word to describe wiki people on the whole giving any such editing life. Boscaswell (talk) 10:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There has been some redacting; see revision history. I have been watching this page for some time, and I was not happy with that at the time. However, as the article says, "In May 2004 Sants joined the Financial Services Authority as the Managing Director responsible for Wholesale and Institutional Markets. He was appointed FSA Chief Executive in July 2007." So he became CEO a only a month before the credit crunch, and thus can hardly be held primarily responsible for it. The FSA under Turner and Hants has been much more proactive than it had been during the somnolent years leading up to the crisis. He is an industry insider who seems to me to be less keen on reforming the finance industry than Lord Turner. At the end of the day, if you have well-sourced information to add to the article to make for a more balanced picture, go ahead ... Wildfowl (talk) 16:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But! He was the Managing Director responsible for Wholesale and Institutional Markets (for the three years prior to his apptmt as Chief Exec)...!? I don't profess to know all the ins and outs of the internal workings of the FSA, but then I've never been one to cover walls with whitewash either. It would of course have been impossible for anyone heading up the FSA post-credit crunch to have been as somnolent as had been the case before and not be crucified by everyone, would it not? Reading this article reminded me a little of the constant whitewashing if not eulogising of a certain Mr Putin on another page here. And then there was the lack of explanation of what the various firms he worked for were/became, what his job title means/meant etc etc. Impenetrable to all but those already "in the know". I didn't think that that was what wiki was about.Boscaswell (talk) 02:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hector Sants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]