Talk:Health ecology

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

General comments on content[edit]

As an ecohealth practitioner, I think this is an excellent article and in general it represents the subject matter very well. However, I suggest that the scope of the EcoHealth discipline is wider than what is suggested in this article. For example, the opening paragraph currently states that EcoHealth focusses on "how changes in the earth’s ecosystems are impacting human health", and that "EcoHealth examines changes in the biological, physical, social and economic environments and relates these changes to impacts upon human health." In fact, EcoHealth is not just about examining the impacts of change, though that is where it has its roots; it has broadened in recent years to include the study of basic ecosystem-health relationships where change is not the primary focus, and applying the concept of "healthy environment = healthy people" to studies within a range of other disciplines including food production / food security, economics, international devlopment / poverty reduction, sociology, disaster prevention etc. I suggest that this needs to be reflected in the text. For examples, see the reports of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the websites of the International Association for Ecology and Health, and the COHAB Initiative. Mudpuddles1418 (talk) 19:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The intro basically said the same thing in three different ways. I trimmed the redundancy. It isn't a good article, it's pretty badly written actually. Important subject, deserves better.--Cuthbert Bargepole (talk) 00:37, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Businesses[edit]

The paragraph titled "Businesses" contains one link, to a building design company (http://www.epochhomes.net/home.htm ). While I'm sure that the business is reputable and that the sustainable building design product it offers is environmentally sound, it has nothing to do with the theme of this Wikipedia entry. EcoHealth is a scientific discipline focused on the links between ecosystem health and human health. While sustainable building design is an important part of economically and envronmentally sustainable development, it is not of direct relevance to the global issues of population health, ecosystem integrity and international development which EcoHealth addresses. Therefore, I suggest deleting the paragraph / link as it adds nothing to a reader's understanding of the EcoHealth discipline, and merely seems to advertise a business. Mudpuddles1418 (talk) 19:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

I notice that the category "Environment" has been changed to "Environmental health". I suggest that this is inappropriate - it is widely accepted that the term "environmental health" applies to conditions in the human built or physical environment that affect human health, with focus on the occurrence and effects of chemicals, biologics or physical hazards associated with the residential and working environments (see the definition of "environmental health" used by the World Health Organisation). "Environmental health" does not apply to ecosystems or to prevailing conditions in the natural environment, nor does it apply to plant and animal health or to the wider areas of natural systems which EcoHealth deals with as a discipline. Therefore I suggest that "Environmental health" be deleted, and "Environment" reinstated as a category heading. Theartsvault (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EcoHealth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150813135309/http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx to http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on EcoHealth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]