Talk:Halo 4 Original Soundtrack

Halo 4 Original Soundtrack has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 10, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Halo Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Halo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Halo series on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HaloWikipedia:WikiProject HaloTemplate:WikiProject HaloHalo articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cake Mania (series) (0 participants)
Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (9 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (9 participants)
Stick Soldiers (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (15 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Potential source[edit]

An interview with Sotaro Tojima [1]. James086 ^Talk 12:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dolby has a Tumblr? Bwaa? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 00:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Halo 4 Original Soundtrack/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 21:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll review this one. ★★Retro Lord ★★ 21:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing concern: "production team have enlisted a 16-person, hand-picked, male tenor/bass choir plus 10 female Bulgarian vocalists, a full 50-piece orchestra, and a host of other performers to work on the soundtrack" Seems to be copied from http://www.halowaypoint.com/halo4/en-us/#!an-epic-universe/soundtrack/59e1db4b-7acc-4572-bd10-523151c0772c Could you please fix this?

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	" he kept monitors with interesting visuals" Could you rewrite this? It doesn't quite make sense Not done "album debuted the No. 50" What does this mean?
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	The track listings section is unreferenced, please fix this
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Discussion[edit]

In response to 2b. The first article reference: Halo 4 Soundtrack details is a suitable source for the track listing. However does the track listing section actually need citations? I've never seen another album article with citations on the track listing section after it's release. The1337gamer (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's providing information I don't see why it wouldn't need citations. ★★Retro Lord ★★ 22:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added them. The1337gamer (talk) 07:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find in that reference anything about the lengths of the songs, is it in there? If not, could you get a ref for that too please? ★★Retro Lord ★★ 09:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the references to iTunes listing. The1337gamer (talk) 09:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adjusted the paraphrasing; I believe all your currently-listed concerns have been addressed. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:33, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The last to do listed has been addressed. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does O'Donnell/Salvatori get paid for originality in new games?[edit]

dfssdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.144.43 (talk) 02:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Halo 4 Original Soundtrack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]