Talk:Hadit

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thelema, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ThelemaWikipedia:WikiProject ThelemaTemplate:WikiProject ThelemaThelema articles

Ancient Egypt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Untitled[edit]

Ningishidda: Mitochondrial DNA is only contained in the egg so the reference to Hadit being represented by "sperm" is sexist and misleading as well as unscientific. Corrected.

Original research[edit]

This site on Horus/Heru [1] is used as a reference to support the claim that 'Hadit' from the Book of the Law is the same as the ancient Egyptian god Horus. The site itself contains no references to 'Hadit'. There is a reference to the Greek name Haidith, but to say that this is equivalent to Hadit based on the similarity alone appears to be original research. No evidence is presented that 'Hadit' from the Book of the Law has an authentic connection with ancient Egyptian religion. Furthermore, there is a reference earlier in the article to DNA. Since DNA was not discovered until decades after the Book of the Law was written, this seems more like an original interpretation or a religious claim rather than encyclopaedic information.--Smcg8374 (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hadit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929025515/http://www.wagenburg.at/staticE/page161.html to http://www.wagenburg.at/staticE/page161.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hadit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114122952/http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Main_Page to http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Main_Page
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071117102407/http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Hadit to http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Hadit

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overemphasis on Kenneth Grant's interpretations[edit]

The article's bibliography seems to excessively draw from Kenneth Grant's works and interpretations, citing five books by Grant and only two other sources: an archived and no longer online article and one Thelemapedia article. The article itself has many unsourced attributions which seem to have originated with Kenneth Grant. The archived article, found at https://web.archive.org/web/20071117102407/http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Hadit, also seems to use Kenneth Grant's works as though they are authoritative. Xelkman (talk) 23:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]