Talk:HMS Thisbe (1824)

HMS Thisbe (1824) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 1, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Thisbe (1824)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will do ASAP. JAGUAR 21:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments[edit]

"her quarterdeck and a pair of 9-pounder cannon" - plural or no plural? Am I wrong or right? I remember reading from somewhere that no plural is the correct usage!
No dead links
No dab links

This is the shortest GAN I have ever reviewed, and I understand the impossibility of finding more content for a 200 year old ship that never entered service. I couldn't raise any issues (like I thought I would), so I'll be forced to promote this one outright. As such, I won't be putting this down as a personal entry in the Wales competition because I feel that this review is too short and didn't require much effort! In my opinion this meets the "broad" part of the GA criteria as an exception, due to the circumstances. JAGUAR 21:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]