Talk:HMS King George V (41)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Comments
- See also section is unused, except for interwiki and portal box. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Refit section table needs more info on the locations. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Section Action with Bismarck needs a main article template to the battle page. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- This article has many grammatical errors, I fixed one, but there are still many errors. Can I ask for consistency and correction of caps? WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- My terrible grammar skills strike again. I'll go over the article again and correct my mishaps! Thurgate (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I've changed all of the mistakes I can see, but my grammar is pretty iffy, so I have probably not caught everything. Thurgate (talk) 23:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Goto the guild. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 01:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- AustralianRupert has just done a lot of copy-editing on the article, are you now happy with it or do you think I should still send it to the guild? Thurgate (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Goto the guild. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 01:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Source comments:
- Greenwich, not Greenwhich, correct?
- Fixed by AustralianRupert
- Sort the sources alphabetically.
- Fixed by AustralianRupert
- I would not support Uboat.net as a reliable source. Could you change it out or support it with another? WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 01:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest acquireing more sources before moving up the ladder; I have quite a few at my library and I might help you get it to A (if you wish). WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 23:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Greenwich, not Greenwhich, correct?
- Expand section Construction or merge with section Design. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 23:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Overall more links would be appreciated, especially in the body. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 23:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Wiki-links? Thurgate (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- I've added the links as per your suggestion, do you want more links or do you think the amount at the moment will suffice? Thurgate (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Wiki-links? Thurgate (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)