Talk:Gypsum concrete

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 September 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Move to Gypsum concrete.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Gyp-Crete is a product name.[edit]

"Gyp-Crete" is a product name that has turned into an industry term for any gypsum concrete. Its significance is relevant because industry professionals use the term 'gyp-crete' interchangeably with 'gypsum concrete'. Information was once again added to the article to state this fact. Nlghills (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. Gyp-Crete is the accepted, and honestly the only, term for this product type ... no matter what the actual manufacturer is. To be clear, nobody in the construction industry ever uses the term 'gypsum concrete'. --Gebl Gebl Gebl (talk) 01:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No longer a stub?[edit]

I am a new editor and not certain whether it is appropriate to remove the stub tag at this point. Is the article big enough? MSCI100SLL (talk) 16:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I removed the stub category. Sandcherry (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gypsum concrete. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916181340/http://insulation.net/the_products_and_services/gypsum_concrete.php to http://www.insulation.net/the_products_and_services/gypsum_concrete.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]