Talk:Guillermo Owen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Founding father?[edit]

I have searched on google.com but I have found no evidence supporting the bold claim that Owen is one of the "founding fathers" of Game Theory. I will let the article rest for a day and if there is no evidence to bolster that claim, I will VfD b/c otherwise Owen is not notable. There are many university professors out there, many more notable, but Wikipedia is not an academic repository for all professors. I will attempt to message the author of the article. EDIT: no can do...the author has listed Owen in List of mathematicians and List of Colombians already, making me suspect vanity -- Bubbachuck 05:08, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Founding father?[edit]

Claiming tha Google is the only source of evidence is also false (especially for scientific work). The fact that Owen is considered a founding father of game theory is not my claim: The short Owen's biography that appeared in Wikipedia was also published in

Theory and Decision Publisher: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers B.V. ISSN: 0040-5833 (Paper) 1573-7187 (Online) DOI: 10.1007/s11238-004-5630-x Issue: Volume 56, Numbers 1-2 Date: February 2004

Contemporary mathematicians in evolutionary game theory like Josef Hofbauer, University of Vienna, Austria and Ken Binmore, University College London, United Kingdom might give a better answer to this. Perhaps it is better to ask the editorial board of Theory and Decision why they wrote that in the foreword of such issue.

The author.

I apologize if I sounded condescending or insulting to you or Dr. Owen. There was no malicious intent on my part, I just did not like the fact that "founding father" was asserted when I could not find it on google.com. I did look into your arguments (I would appreciate a non-sarcastic tone in the future though), and found the article you were speaking of here, as well as the entire biography...copied word for word. I am forced to tag with "copyvio" because its a published scientific journal and is obviously copyrighted. wikipedia does not allow copyrighted information on its pages.
here are your options if you want the article to remain:
  • 1) re-write the biography in your own words, perferably from multiple sources
  • 2) request permission from the journal editors
I hope that helps. On the bright side, I am utterly convinced Dr. Owen is notable now :) -- Bubbachuck 03:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. from my experience with biology articles, google is an excellent resource for scientific papers. for example, if i know two or more of the authors of a paper, i can enter their names and a keyword and most of the time the first hit is the article i'm looking for.
it appears the link changes. try [1]. -- Bubbachuck 05:46, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Answer, again[edit]

Please accept my apologies. I did not want to sound rude or something. Also, I apologize for my ignorance: I have realized this biography is copyrighted (copyright laws in my country are not as sharp as in the U.S.). I am truly sorry. I would like to remove the original piece and write it again with my own words but on the web site there is a notice saying "Please do not edit this page for the moment". What should I do?

Thank you very much.

P.S. Perhaps you are right. This is the only biography of Dr. Owen in which I found he is a "founding father". If I can not come como across another reference that states the same, I will avoid such words and write only the facts.

You may write it on a temporary subpage, linked from the original copyright notice. Quote: If you want to work on this article meanwhile, write a new article at the temporary subpage, and indicate that you have done so on this page's talk page. By the way I encourage you to create a Wikipedia account before you do so it will properly credited to your name. -- Bubbachuck 22:20, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New Page posted[edit]

New page has been created. Please check if it is Ok now. Thanks!

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guillermo Owen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]