Talk:Greaves Hall

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Vegaswikian (talk) 00:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greaves Hall Hospital → Greaves Hall — Focus of the article is (quite rightly) on the Greaves Hall mansion, not the hospital which occupied it for less than half of the building's history. Small-town hero (talk) 19:22, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Strongly Support as people will be looking for a full article about Greaves Hall, when they type in 'Greaves Hall' on to Wikipedia they get this section on the Banks, Lancashire article, which only gives the reader a small amount of infomation on Greaves Hall. Also Small-town hero is right that the hospital only occupied the building for a small amount of time, there was also the school and not forgeting the family who lived there and built it. In conclusion I belive the article should just be called 'Greaves Hall'. However what should the Greaves Hall section be called on the Banks, Lancashire article? It can not be called 'Greaves Hall Hospital'.93gregsonl2 (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lets just create the page "Greaves Hall" and move the whole article over there! it would be much easier! also the "Greaves Hall Hospital" can just be a redirect page to the Main "Greaves Hall" page. I think that would be for the best!Bankhallbretherton (talk) 22:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, no, no, no! Cut and paste moves are not good. If everyone is happy for the move to go ahead, let's leave it for an admin to do properly. Small-town hero (talk) 22:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well i dont know why not? it gets the job done much quicker than waiting forever! LOL but whatever you think is best...Bankhallbretherton (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you do a move like that it seperates the article from the revision history. You should always use the "move" tab at the top of your screen to move a page, and if that's not possible request a move at WP:RM. Small-town hero (talk) 17:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok i didnt know! thanks for that! Bankhallbretherton (talk) 17:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The building has not tecnically been removed from site as all the demolition material still remains, but is leveled out awaiting re development. Bankhallbretherton (talk) 01:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.