Talk:Great Controversy theme

Emphasis on book more

"The Great Controversy" is a book, right? This article needs to mention the book a lot more, and be less of a free-floating theological essay which is very difficult for non-Adventists to understand... AnonMoos 23:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

I will have a look through to see how this can be fixed. Thanks, Ansell 00:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Essay from main page

The following is an essay type summary of the book which may be relevant, but in its current form does not fit the page.

The Great Controversy Worldview

Before Jesus

As the Great Controversy goes beyond just the story of our planet, it starts in heaven. At one stage in the past the universe was at peace and every one of God’s creations in the many populated worlds adored and served God. However, from a certain moment, the greatest angel ever created, Lucifer, somehow developed a desire to become God. He challenged Gods law of ‘Love and Justice’ as oppressive and united a third of the angels of heaven in direct opposition to God. Their main belief was that God was not worthy of creaturely allegiance. There are only two principle's by which the universe can function: self-sacrificing love and selfishness. God espoused self-sacrificing love and Satan espoused selfishness.

Soon after the beginning of the rebellion there was war in heaven between Lucifer and his angels and Michael and the remaining angels. Michael, as the second member of the Godhead, along with twice the number of angels managed to win the battle and expel the rebellious angels from heaven. God did not destroy the rebellious angels and made sure everyone had a free choice in the matter. From then on every creature in the universe has had to make a choice, sooner or later, whether to obey God or to rebel against him and join the fallen angels, headed by Lucifer. Earth was no exception.

At this time the only inhabitants of our planet were Adam and Eve, who lived in the Garden of Eden and were responsible for the planet. When God created the Earth and the Garden along with Adam and Eve the rebellion seems to have already started as he purposely creates a tree, known as the ‘tree of knowledge of good and evil’. Satan, Lucifer’s post rebellion name, is limited to this tree in tempting Adam and Eve to disobey God and join the rebellion. Sure enough, after some time, Eve approaches the tree.

Satan, disguised as a talking serpent, convinces Eve that God is not worth of creaturely allegiance and obedience as she accepts to eat from the forbidden tree. The situation becomes irreversible when Adam joins her in the rebellion. Now one hundred percent of the Earth joined the rebellion and passed on the command of this planet to Satan. As no other planet has accepted to join the rebellious group, Earth would become the epic centre of this battle between God and Satan. However, Gods law of ‘love and justice’ itself proposed a paradox in his actions for if he killed the rebellious individuals he would be just but not love. Yet if he let them live eternally he would be love yet not just. This irresolvable paradox proposed a challenge to God’s leadership with extensive consequences.

When God comes to the Garden to meet with Adam and Eve as he used to at the end of each day, he couldn’t find them. They hid from certain death. However, when God finally met with them, their death did not follow. God cursed the ground for the benefit of mankind and allowed men to die, forcing mankind to make moral choices under duress. He also proclaimed promises that would set the stage for life on Earth from that day on and would give hope to the fallen couple and the rest of humanity. God cursed the serpent and the ground, but not Adam and Eve. God simply gave them a sad description of the pain of their future life.

They were blessed because they did not die immediately and received a chance to live forever again through an offspring of the woman. Also, God did not allow man to unite on the same level with Satan and the rebellion. Though Man rejected God's Spirit and was in harmony now with Satan's rebellion, God gave to Mankind access to the Holy Spirit so that he retained the power of choice. Man was to become naturally frightened by and avoid the Devil (another name for Lucifer after the rebellion) and his angels. However, death was still a reality on that day. Their clothes being made by God from animal skin and the sacrificial worship they would perform soon after suggest that God introduced them to substitutionary death. Here the sacrifice of the animal would be a symbol of when the offspring of the woman would be killed in the place of all humanity.

Worship from that moment on should involve the death of an innocent animal that would represent the death of Jesus, the son of God, many years later. This soteriological symbol was expressed by the sanctuary model given to Moses and followed for generations thereafter. For the thousands of years from Eden to Jesus, people had the chance of leaving the rebellion and choosing salvation by accepting forgiveness of sins by means of the sacrifice of an innocent being. The Great Controversy does not support the view that the sacrifice of Jesus was necessary to somehow expiate God's broken law, but instead that his death demonstrated the hatred of those who followed Satan's position of selfishness, against God. It is clear from the Bible record that Jesus was put to death because he taught God's principles of self-sacrificing love. Though God protected Jesus life previously, at the appointed time God stepped back and allowed the demonstration that, by its nature selfishness would gladly exterminate God. The two principles of selfishness and self-sacrificing love cannot co-exist. Only by that permissive act can God be said to be implicated in the death of Christ. Jesus, as the second untainted Adam, fully man and imbued with the Holy Spirit, gave mankind a demonstration of total devotion to God. As Man had previously inherited the first Adam's bent toward self-centered destruction, Man could now adhere to the second Adam's path to life eternal through faith, love and appreciation for His self-sacrificing, God-centered life.

The story of Job gives much insight into this war, as it shows Satan representing the Earth in some sort of universal council. It is easy to see the theme of the war throughout the story of Job, where both God and Satan have a point to prove. Satan in saying that no creature can worship God in all circumstances and God in showing that he is worthy of creaturely allegiance and that it is possible to worship him. Although we are not told of this in most stories of the Old Testament, this background war seems to be at play from page to page as it points to the Deliverer who is to free mankind. Jesus demonstrated a devotion to God, to the point of eternal death, showing that Satan's accusations that "skin for skin, a man will give anything for his life," was not true of Jesus. Jesus made the decision that He could trust God even in the face of eternal death. Jesus' dilemma was that becasue God is the only source of eternal life, if God allowed Him to die there might not be a resurrection. However, as God He was tempted to tap into the life that was in Himself as God and not succumb to death. Jesus put Himself into the hands of God despite the risk of eternal annihilation.

After Jesus

It was many years after the promise in the Garden that Jesus was born. He was fully God and yet fully human and had a mission with at least three objectives: 1) To reveal God’s character; 2) To demonstrate that a creature is able to serve God in both ‘love and justice’ and 3) To make it possible for humanity to be saved. His life as we know it certainly shows that he accomplished all three. However, it is the accomplishment of the third objective that gives us greatest hope. From Jesus’ death on the cross God redeemed humanity and gave every one the choice of being saved. The cross became efficient for every human being, yet only effective for those who accept it.

After the cross, Satan was finally banished from heaven as his battle was now lost. Jesus demonstrated that God is both love and just and can be obeyed by his creatures. He also showed that God is worthy of creaturely allegiance and his death would substitute the death of all those who decide against the rebellion. Above this, the cross truly showed the extent of God’s love and at the same time exposed Satan for what he really is, a devil. This was of great importance for the angels that remained in heaven as well as all other creatures of the universe.

However, the war was still far from over. After the cross, God gained rulership over the Earth again and as such was able to provide greater aid in proclaiming salvation. This was evidenced in Pentecost. It was only after the death of Jesus that God could send his Spirit with such power. ‘Christ replaced Satan, the usurper, as the leader of this world. Now Christ won the right to send His Holy Spirit in fullness to willing recipients without violating the creaturely freedom He granted Satan, his demons and rebel humans.’

The continuation of this war after the cross has gained a different momentum. Now the main objective of Satan is to deceive as many as possible to remain distant from God and continue within the rebellion, even if by simply keeping people in ignorance of what Jesus has done. Therefore, what followed the cross was a great number of demons deceiving people so that the reality of this war happening beyond their senses will never be known to them, and if known, never believed.

At this stage it is important to note that within the Great Controversy worldview death means exactly that. When a person dies, they die completely. This springs from a particular understanding of the body, soul and spirit based on the creation of man. When God created man, he formed the body, which was unconscious until God breathed his Spirit into man. Only then man became conscious as a living soul. Therefore the Spirit of life belongs to God and brings life to an inanimate body. The combination of these, body and living Spirit, forms a living soul.

Death, therefore, is the Spirit of life leaving the body and returning to God. Death of the body also means the death of the soul, as without a body man cannot be a living soul. The immediate implication of this is that individuals will not go anywhere when they die. Judgement therefore, does not happen before each individual dies as they will remain dead until resurrected.

The end of this war will start taking place when Jesus returns. His return is accompanied by the retrieving of all those humans that somehow remained faithful to the principles of heaven, consciously or not. This is preceded, of course, by a careful judgement from God, which as indicated, will not happen in multiple occasions before each person dies, but rather in one specific period of time. This segregation of ‘sheep and goats (Mt 25)’ has been feared greatly by many peoples, especially in the middle ages, where misconceptions of this judgement were also very common. It is here that the evident paradox emerges: how can a God of love destroy his own creatures? The extinction of evil is vital for the preservation of good and so judgement is an important element of the Great Controversy worldview as in it God decides who has clang on to evil and who has not.

God has made many promises that he would call a people about the same time as his judgement period to proclaim a special message to this world before his return. This message is contained in Revelation 14 and is known as ‘The Three Angels Message’. These are messages of awakening to a world that is sleeping and is ignorant of it. The people who would proclaim this message are compared to John the Baptist in the sense of preparing the way for the coming of Christ. Thus this people were to be called to prepare the way for the second coming of Jesus.

When Jesus finally returns, there will be a massive resurrection of all those who rejected evil since the beginning of the world and they will all be taken up to heaven. In contrast, all those who have clang on to evil will die. Then, for a thousand years, the saved will live with God in heaven whilst the earth will remain chaotic with only Satan and his demons roaming around it.

The activity of those that are taken to heaven is mainly to look through the ‘books’ and judge God’s judgement. They will review every case of every human and verify whether God has been both ‘Love’ and ‘Just’. However, even as this period unfolds and humans realise that God is both ‘Love’ and ‘Just’, the war is not over. There are still billions of people along with Satan and his demons who would perhaps disagree and the war can only end when the character of God is not questioned by any creature, including Satan.

At the end of this millennium God returns once again with all redeemed humans and the city of God. God then resurrects all the remaining humans and leaves them to the leadership of Satan, who unites them to an attack on the holy city. However, before the attack all eyes will see the ceremony of the coronation of Jesus along with images from his life and death. It is amongst this imagery that all who watch, saved and lost, angels and demons, bow down and admit that God is ‘Love’ and ‘Just’, including Satan. At that point there will be no doubt that God is worthy of creaturely allegiance and hence the greatest question ever raised would now be answered unanimously by ever creature.

At the end of the ceremony, Satan will try to unite man and attack the city in one desperate attempt to revert the situation, but as they try God calls for fire from heaven which descends and destroys evil and all those who chose to cling to it. This same fire also cleanses the Earth and prepares it for the new creation. At this stage we are told the saved will be crying for those that were lost, but God himself comes and wipes their tears as he creates everything anew. The new creation will be even greater than the first and from that point on, evil will no longer arise as every being in the universe has seen the consequences of rebellion. At this moment

"the great controversy is ended. Sin and sinners are no more. The entire universe is clean. One pulse of harmony and gladness beats through the vast creation. From Him who created all, flow life and light and gladness, throughout the realms of illimitable space. From the minutest atom to the greatest world, all things, animate and inanimate, in their unshadowed beauty and perfect joy, declare that God is love."

If someone could edit the above into a reasonable piece describing the book it would be great. Ansell 00:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Citations that reference the Great Controversy theme

• Bull, Malcolm; Lockhart, Keith (2007). Seeking a Sanctuary: Seventh-day Adventism and the American Dream (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-253-34764-0.

The nineteenth century witnessed a revolution in American publishing, and the Adventist press followed the general trend. As technology improved, it became easier to produce longer books. This advance also necessitated a constant flow of copy, an example of which can be seen in the books dealing with the "great controversy" theme--White's classic exposition of the ongoing battle between good and evil. The central idea of the great controversy is a cosmic struggle between Christ and Satan, which the prophetess traced from its origins in heaven to its final resolution at the close of the millennium. The great controversy theme first appreared in the first volume of Spiritual Gifts in 1858. Material from the Spiritual Gifts series was expanded to for the four-volume Spirit of Prophecy series in 1870-1884. Between 1888 and 1917, this series was transformed into the Conflict of the Ages series that comprised five books..., p. 24

What's the point of the section "Other commentary" and "Clifford Goldstein"?

Maybe I'm just dense. I've reread that section a few times and I just don't understand the intent or relevance. Is there some assumption being made, or did someone want to mention some largely tangential item that happens to contain some relevant words? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyg (talk • contribs) 16:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Controversy theme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100117052532/http://atoday.com/content/the-great-controversy-unlikely-source to http://www.atoday.com/content/the-great-controversy-unlikely-source

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Info. on origins of the great controversy worldview

Can someone add info. on the origins of the great controversy worldview??? It can be traced to the “great controversy” vision that the SDA Prophetess Ellen G. White during in a funeral service at Ohio in 1858, where she saw a cosmic war being waged throughout the ages between Jesus and angelic armies and Satan and his. Mrs. White detailed it in her book Spiritual Gifts, which she later expanded into Spirit of Prophecy and Conflict of Ages.

Recommended Source: Ellen White’s six volume biography by Author White. 68.40.32.185 (talk) 18:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Section on Criticism NEEDED.

Hi again!! am not a legal editor of Wikipedia but can someone add information on the criticism of the Great Controversy Theme. I would send links from Dale Ratzlaff’s Life Proclamation Ministries (LPM) and his magazine Proclamation!, but Wikipedia is not allowing me to publish them on the Talk Page (even though I have NO association with Mr. Ratzlaff). I do not know why!!??

~Grandson of SDA Pastor Tony Cirigliano. 2601:407:C400:94D1:6DA6:7085:E72:F8B3 (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Please delete this page!

This is an example of many such thoroughly sectarian pages that Adventists have poured into Wikipedia. Like the rest, this has no place in an encyclopedia. It belongs in internal Adventist apologetic literature not here. Wctrenchard (talk) 05:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

You need to formally nominate it for deletion using the Wikipedia "AfD" process (just venting here is unlikely to accomplish much). An article could be useful to Wikipedia even if it covers esoteric theological details of one religion, as long as the details are "notable" and the article is reliably sourced. On the other hand, if the article text presents one religion as true using "Wikipedia's voice", or is not based on solid scholarship, then that could be a big problem. AnonMoos (talk) 23:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

\