Talk:Grand Hotel Karel V

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:08, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Grand Restaurant Karel V be merged into Grand Hotel Karel V. Given that the restaurant is only one component of the larger hotel entity, the content in the restaurant article can more easily be given appropriate context within the hotel article. SchroCat (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I object to the merger. The restaurant, with its Michelin star, is notable on its own. The building, Duitse Huis, is also notable on its own. The present article Grand Hotel Karel V is a strange combination of advertising, Duitse Huis and Grand Restaurant Karel V. The Banner talk 20:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If Banner had demonstrated notability of the restaurant in its own right aside from the Michelin star from 2005-2013 (without repadding it with irrelevant info from the historical building) and said something notable about its cuisine and operations I'd have been happy to keep it separate, but as Aymatth has produced a decent article on the hotel I think it would be best to merge into a restaurant section in the hotel article unless Banner can reasonably expand the restaurant into something which would be too large to merge. I don't believe in inherent notability of things, yes it had one star for 6 years, but unless you can produce independent reliable sources which discuss the restaurant and its cuisine in detail then I think a merge is constructive. It's very sad to see Banner that you nominated the hotel article for deletion, seemingly in retaliation. Perhaps our master restaurant writer User:Miyagawa could write a very good article on it or shed some more light on this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a better idea to merge this article into Duitse Huis. More than half of the article is already about the building. The Banner talk 22:18, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • As per Dr. Blofeld, if things had been written differently with more emphasis being on the food rather than the architecture, I would have been happy. I support the merge as it stands at the moment. Cassiantotalk 21:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge. I added a footnote to this article giving chef names and dates, so the target now contains all the information given in the source. There does not seem to be much to say about the restaurant, but it is worth a mention in the hotel article. If more information emerges on the restaurant the redirect can always be turned back into an article. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:39, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge. Everything worth saying about the restaurant seems to have been said in the hotel article already. Ivanvector (talk) 20:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    The only thing is that the article about the restaurant was there before. The Banner talk 18:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Congratulations for the execution of a perfectly valid article. You should be proud on yourself. The Banner talk 09:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake[edit]

Aymatth2, could you please correct the mistake with GaultMillau? They have not rewarded any points in 2014, as their guide is published in autumn... The Banner talk 18:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tweaked the wording. They are showing a rating of 14 as of June 2014, presumably carried over from last year. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tags[edit]

@Banner- You may be right, but could you help me out by explaining why you find this overdetailed - it seems like a good architectural description. Or why the whole article needs a advertisement hatnote - where the individual sentences would be better tagged-- Clem Rutter (talk) 10:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If there is advertising, it is not intended. The fact that the hotel is in a former military hospital may be seen as negative, and the fact that the restaurant won a Michelin star and then lost it is far from positive. Given the history, I suggest that any proposed non-trivial changes to this article be discussed here first. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Grand Hotel Karel V. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grand Hotel Karel V. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grand_Hotel_Karel_V&oldid=1205605344"