This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Even when the song might be notable, shall the "Lead Me into Love" page be merged into the album page? George Ho (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the current state of the song article I'd support a merger, though it's possible the article could be expanded to the point that I'd feel otherwise. DonIago (talk) 04:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article was nominated for deletion; the result was "no consensus". Even when the song may be "notable", the song article has not been tremendously expanded. The content was copied and pasted into the album page in case of potential merger, but the song article was not yet redirected to there. Shall the song article be merged, redirected, or what else? George Ho (talk) 19:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like an obvious redirect candidate to me. Nothing will be lost since the content has been carried over already. If additional information is added later (like the book source mentioned in the deletion discussion), it can always be split back out. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]