Talk:Gitea

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

How to keep the version current?[edit]

The version listed is not the latest version and misses a number of security updates. My attempt to add the current version to the list results in an error on this page, but I don't know how to correct it. On the other hand, I don't think people should be misled to install an insecure version. 2A02:C7F:F6F4:4200:DAE5:9BC:AD9A:C64D (talk) 23:20, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it, it was an issue with things being labelled "preferred". Unbeatable101 (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forgejo Section[edit]

The section Forgejo fork is currently being frequently editing in and out of the page. Should Forgejo be included within this page, or should it not? Steve0Greatness (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Until we have come to consensus, this section probably should not be removed from the body of this article. Steve0Greatness (talk) 00:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~The latest revision is biased towards the project.~~ Considering to remake the section into an article We should invite people to discuss here before editing. Ahri.boy (talk) 11:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Protected due to edit warring Ahri.boy (talk) 05:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's the next? When will you remove the advertisment content? I think I have posted enough evidences and references here. You can find more information from the projects Github and blog. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea & https://blog.gitea.com . If somebody forked wikipedia, should that be put into the wikipedia page in the wikipedia site? 103.152.112.176 (talk) 03:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@103.152.112.176 then, I'd consider tag the section. Ahri.boy (talk) 03:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to do the tag. What's the next should we do to remove the advertisement? 5.34.216.37 (talk) 05:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a famous open source project, the project have many fork projects. I don't think puting a fork here have any good reason. It looks like an advertisement. The Gitea community still have over 50+ maintainers and yearly election even if the company involved. You can find the information here https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#technical-oversight-committee-toc. And Gitea nowadays becomes more actively than before even there are many forks. So please stop adding advertisement in Gitea's page. The correct operation is creating a new page for your fork and announcement it forked from Gitea in that page. Should we put hundreds of Gitea forks in Gitea page? 199.230.105.54 (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]