This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
Tet another anti-German page on Wikipedia. Do you have pages on the intense Polonisation exersizes of Poland in all the surrounding lands (belonging to others) they invaded over the centuries, not least since 1919 and 1945? Thought not. 2A00:23C4:B607:CF00:F92B:9A1:8477:FF6E (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Do you have pages on the intense Polonisation exersizes". Yes. The main article is Polonization. Dimadick (talk) 09:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But suppose that we didn't have the article on Polonization, and that subject just happened to have slipped through the cracks, how would that make a bit of difference to the validity of this article, which is sourced to reliable sources? The answer is, it wouldn't, because the existence or non-existence of other articles is not a reflection on the accuracy of this one. I do not think that Wikipedia is in any way "anti-German", but it is pretty clearly anti-Nazi, not to the extent that we allow our articles on Nazism to be propagandistic or inaccurate -- they have to fulfill the same standards as any other article -- but to the extent that the vast majority of Wikipedia editors reject Nazism, neo-Nazism, and fascism. In my view, that's not a bug, it's a feature. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The lead says "Germanisation also occurs when a word from the German language is adopted into a foreign language (for this purpose, German has a special word, Eindeutschung, in contrast to the general translation, Germanisierung)." However, this (taken together as a whole) is unreferenced, unsupported by the article body, and incorrect. The first half of the sentence, before the parenthetical, could plausibly either be a mix-up which was supposed to be the other way around (when discussing the German language, Germanisation occurs when non-German words are adopted and adapted into German, and this is, as the parenthetical states, also called Eindeutschung), or else it could be a (slightly confusing but technically accurate) summary of how languages like Czech were Germanised by importing German words (but in that case the unreferenced and unsupported-in-the-article-body parenthetical must be dropped, because Eindeutschung is the opposite process). -sche (talk) 22:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
