Talk:Georgia (typeface)

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft: Windows Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Microsoft Windows (assessed as Mid-importance).

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article[edit]

This article was best kept and developed in georgia ''''font123456789''''

Sure. This

Headline text

one also?

There is a conflict between the article and it's description on the disambiguation page for "Georgia". It states that the font was developed for Apple but the article says it was developed for Microsoft. I don't know what the truth is, but somebody who knows should change it. NappilainenĜ

If you are not sure, use what the article, rather than the disambiguation page notes. -- User:Docu

Georgia was developed by Matthew Carter for the Microsoft Web fonts project. -- happysri —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 03:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Along with Hoefler Text and FF Scala, it is one of the few typefaces in common use with ranging, or “old style," numerals (also called text figures), which are designed to complement lowercase text without disrupting the overall texture the way lining figures do. This can present some difficulties however in displaying numbers in columnar layout, as the figures are not monospaced.

This is a wrong information. There are hundreds of high quality typefaces with old style figures (OSF), actually most text fonts have them. And typefaces like Adobe Garamond and Minion (both with OSF) are much more commonly used than the above mentioned. Also OSF in generals are not causing problems for columnar layouts. This is true for proportional figures, but normal lining figures are proportional too. This is why some fonts have special monospace figures. So there are actually 4 types of figures: proportional (OSF + lining) and monospace (OSF + lining). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.12.243.151 (talk) 13:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and such info would probably be better placed on the text figures page anyway. But the figure style is a striking difference between Georgia and Times New Roman, so I've put back a single sentence on this in the para comparing them. Qwfp (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia vs. Times New Roman[edit]

Times New Roman is slightly narrower, with a more vertical axis

This is not true. In fact, Georgia's letters have a vertical axis, whereas the axes of Times New Roman's letters are slightly askew (for example, compare the letters g or o) . --SelfishSeahorse (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.ascendercorp.com/pr/2009-09-08/
Triggered by \bascendercorp\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Georgia on Wikipedia[edit]

It may be worth noting in the article that Georgia is used on Wikipedia for page titles and for headings. For example, a simple inspection with a browser shows the following CSS rule: `.mw-body h1, .mw-body h2 { font-family: "Linux Libertine",Georgia,Times,serif; ... }` JoeyTwiddle (talk) 06:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JoeyTwiddle you are right Vincent-vst (talk) 04:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's only used as a fallback when you don't have Linux Libertine installed, not as a first choice. (Although many important systems come without Linux Libertine preinstalled, so you aren't really wrong in practice.) The article already establishes Georgia's widespread availability and usage (see § Releases). Mentioning that the default skin on Wikipedia, just like a large number of other graphic designs on the Web, uses it too, is not notable at all and seems a bit superfluous to me. – MwGamera (talk) 20:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgia (typeface). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150424000832/http://web.nickshanks.com/typography/font-descriptions to http://web.nickshanks.com/typography/font-descriptions

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]