Talk:Gender pension gap

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gender pension gap article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Discrimination

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Expertise[edit]

This article includes references from pensions companies as experts on the topic of pensions.Melissa Highton (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A COMPANY would generally NOT be considered a Reliable Source WP:RS. Would an auto company be a RS for info on auto reliability or safety? For an individual company to be considered a Reliable Source, we use WP:USEBYOTHERS as the test, so if you can find research by a pensions company published in newspapers or other journalistic sources, that would lend credibility to that specific company's reports.---Avatar317 ^(talk) 23:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]