Talk:Gaudencio Rosales

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The caption on one of the pictures state that Gaudencio Cardinal Rosales would be the fifth Filipino cardinal. This is incorrect. He would be the sixth Filipino cardinal. The others are (in order of becoming cardinals): Rufino Cardinal Santos, Julio Cardinal Rosales, Jaime Cardinal Sin, Ricardo Cardinal Vidal, and Jose Cardinal Sanchez. The other Cardinal Rosales was born in Calbayog City and was the predecessor of Cardinal Vidal as Archbishop of Cebu. It's unlikely though that the present Cardinal Rosales is related to the late Julio Cardinal Rosales. --Harvzsf 03:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is bad policy to retain very old cardinals. The Pope should have appointed younger ones instead of the 75 year old Rosales. --Florentino floro 08:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ang Ladlad vs Rosales: Moral Stand[edit]

I added this moral stand section, since this caught global attention due to the hysteria Rosales created. Forgetting cover-up on Catholic Filipino priests sex scandals and corruptions, Rosales diverted the attention to: Rosales stated per Radio Veritas on May 5, 2008, that "Gays should not be allowed to participate in Flores de Mayo since it defeats the true meaning of the celebration." Ang Ladlad's founder, Ateneo de Manila professor, Danton Remoto, protested against the cardinal's statement, saying that: "In the eyes of God, everyone is equal; Some of these gay men have saved a lot of money for their gowns (to be worn in the procession) and they were doing it because they believed in the Virgin Mary. They need understanding, not condemnation."www.reuters.com, Manila bishop says against gay men in May parade Rosales countered that: “I am not angry at gay men. But, I am against what they’re actually doing.”queerty.com, No Homos At Mary Celebration, Says Cardinal Rosales, went further, and officially warned with punishment of banning or removal of the faculty for Mass (liturgy) in those Catholic parishes that permit cross-dressing homosexuals to play Saint Helena, or female saints in the Santacruzan or Flores de Mayo procession. He stated: “We should keep sacred what is sacred; The procession is religious. [But] what the [parishes] do is organize it as a parade of homosexual cross-dressers. That’s an insult to the Blessed Mother. Ay, naku po, nakakapanghilakbot! [Oh, mother of mine, it’s hair-raising]; I told them that’s not right because it’s a sacred procession. You are destroying the purity of the devotion.”manilatimes.net, Cardinal: Gays out of ‘Santacruzans’ --Florentino floro (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy[edit]

At last, this article has now a notable controversy:Rosales on June 10, 2008 petitioned the Manila Prosecutor’s Office, per his counter-affidavit, to dismiss the criminal lawsuits filed against him and Pope Benedict XVI by lawyer Elly Pamantong. Pamatong accused them of “arrogantly, oppressively and offensively mounting loud speakers on church rooftops, towers, belfries, and trees that are blaring monotonous rituals and falsehoods, seriously disturbing the peace and quiet of non-Catholics throughout the country.” (Revised Penal Code, Art. 153 and Article 699, New Civil Code of the Philippines.www.gmanews.tv, Manila archbishop asks court to junk cases against him--Florentino floro (talk) 12:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Picture be picture wrong[edit]

His Eminence Cardinal Rosales was consecrated a priest in 1958, and a bishop in 1974 so the note under the picture can not be correct.

(talk) 03:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaudencio Cardinal Rosales.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Gaudencio Cardinal Rosales.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 25 October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gaudencio Rosales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gaudencio Rosales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gaudencio_Rosales&oldid=1211943506"