Talk:GJ 3323

On 31 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from LHS 1723 to Gliese 3323. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 23 December 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Colonestarrice (talk) 08:58, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LHS 1723 → Gliese 3323 – This star is referred to as GJ 3323 in the exoplanet discovery paper and in exoplanet databases, and based on an ADS search it seems to be slightly more common than LHS 1723 in general. The convention on Wikipedia seems to be to always use "Gliese" rather than "GJ" even for the later catalogues, but this isn't always consistent so I'd be fine with moving the page to GJ 3323 instead.

Search results in ADS:

GJ 3323 - 23 results
LHS 1723 - 20 results
LP 656-38 - 1 result

SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. Jerm (talk) 00:57, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support full name per nom, and 'G' per the two planetary names. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Gliese 1214 b which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]