This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Göztepe S.K. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

Fair use rationale for Image:Goztepe logo.gif[edit]

Image:Goztepe logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Goztepe logo.gif[edit]

Image:Goztepe logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aliağa Bld. and Göztepe did NOT merge[edit]

so this is toally wrong: "However, Aliağa Belediyespor merged with Göztepe, so that they took place of Aliağa Belediyespor in the Third League on June 18, 2008."

Aliağa Bld. changed their football team's name to Göztepe source: http://www.tff.org.tr/default.aspx?pageID=250&ftxtID=4371

another example... Turkish Football Federation (official) final standing of 2002-03 season, which shows then-Göztepe as present-day "Aliağa A.Ş." http://www.tff.org.tr/Default.aspx?pageID=550

so present-day Göztepe is unfortunately NOT historic Göztepe team — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.238.97.138 (talk) 21:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger (in the past)[edit]

Göztepe S.K. + İzmirspor = Doğanspor (between 1937-1939) Böri (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 November 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus against move. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 07:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Göztepe S.K. → Göztepe SK – Correct name as per club and naming rules. Discussed on WikiProject Football and in line with WP naming conventions guideline for sports teams. Junk2711 (talk) 01:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As noted by Matthew hk on the other RMs, there was no consensus at the WP:FOOTY discussion, so referring to that as a rationale for moving is somewhat underhand. Also, this sort of change needs to be done en masse via a centralised discussion rather than individual clubs at a time. Number 5 7 12:13, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I agree that all clubs should be moved to titles without dots, but this isn't the correct method for gaining the consensus to do so. – Pee Jay 12:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 13:12, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as above - whatever naming convention is decided, it needs to be constant for all Turkish clubs. There needs to be a central discussion, not a bunch of ill thought out RMs. There is no consensus anywhere that we should not use dots, not any evidence presented that dots are not used. Giant Snowman 13:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Logo[edit]

The logo is wrong. Can anyone use the logo on Turkish page?

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göztepe_SK#/media/Dosya:Göztepe.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmk (talk • contribs) 14:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]