Talk:Future Champions Tournament

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First edition?[edit]

Is this year the inaugural edition of the Future Champions Tournament? According to the SporTV channel commentators, there was an edition held in South Africa last year. Anyway, probably would be better to make separate pages for the tournament and for each one of their editions (I mean the 2009 edition, the 2010 edition, the next year edition, etc). --Carioca (talk) 19:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scores?[edit]

From December 13 2010:

Univ. De Chile 0 - 1 Penarol America-Mex 2 - 2 DC United PSG 0 - 2 Vasco Atletico-MG 1 - 0 Mamelodi Sundowns Club america de mexico 2 - 2 dc united

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Future Champions Tournament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]