Talk:Frango

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Frango as acronym[edit]

My grandmother worked for the Frederick & Nelson company's candy department in Seattle in the late 30s, and at that time it was known by the F&N employees that the name Frango was an acronym for FRederick And Nelson GOodness, as a testimony to Frederick's quality chocolates. --Peel 20:38, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As a former Marshall Field's employee in Fort Wayne, Indiana (which the store is now closed), I worked in the rather small Marketplace and Candy departments, where Frangos were sold. (I also dressed as Mrs. Santa Bear on Thanksgiving weekend). I was taught, in almost a trivial way, that the name of Frangos came from the candy formerly being named Francos, but the name was changed because of the Spanish Civil War and General Franco's alliance with Adolf Hitler some years later. Also, it should be noted that in 2006, Marshall Field's is selling Frangos decorated with a ribbon marking Frangos' 75th Anniversary (1931). If 1918 is the beginning of the Frederick & Nelson candy, perhaps they are not the same thing. --Eric in Indiana, 1 May 2006.
The General Franco story is actually narrated on displays in the flagship Marshall Field's State Street store in downtown Chicago and is considered the official story of how Frango came about. --Gerald Farinas 22:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A wonderful recipe, Frango Mint Cake, used to be sold at Frederick & Nelson. Alas, the recipe seems to have disappeared. If someone has it, please add it to this entry! 170.146.145.50 19:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)BK[reply]

Page modifications[edit]

I'm making some modifications to this page, taking a bunch of different sources and trying to form a coheisve article. I simplifed the header portion of the article, and removed items that really were described later in the article. I also cleaned up the "Two forms" section. It shoudl be known, the Northwest Frango is still made using the original Frederick & Nelson recipe, while the Chicago interpretation has been tweaked over time.

I am going to try to get some pictures of Frango boxes. I live in Seattle but grew up in Chicago, so my freezer and shelves are FULL of both versions of the chocolates, as well as various flavors.

One other thing I think this article should address. Marshall Field's took Frango and used it more as a brand. Frango was applied to all kinds of products. Cookies, coffee, hot chocolate, cheesecake, liqueur, cakes, other candies. When Dayton Hudson (Target Corporation) owned Field's they even opened a Frango Cafe on the 7th floor of State Street.

I still need to do some archive searching, but the following sources are great places to get Frango info:

The Chicago Tribune The Chicago Sun-Times The Seattle Times Seattle Post-Intelligencer Any other Chicago or Seattle TV or Radio news outlet The Marshall Field's Cookbook Joan Greene's "A Chicago Tradition: Marshall Field's Food and Fashon"

Brian Dowd ydkj0022@hotmail.com 130.76.32.145 02:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another good source: Alan J. Stein, Frederick & Nelson's frozen dessert (later mints) Frango is named on June 1, 1918, HistoryLink.org Essay 5771, September 23, 2004. This seems pretty clear about the "Frango" name already being in use in 1918, which should refute the Franco/Frango story. - Jmabel | Talk 02:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Further, after someone again retailed the Franco/Frango story, in discussion at [1] someone says that there is a June 1918 patent using the name "Frango". Unfortunately, there is no specific citation for the patent; someone may want to follow this up.
In any case, I'm now more than convinced that the Franco/Frango story is an urban legend, even if the company itself propagated it. I'm going to reword accordingly. - Jmabel | Talk 23:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Frango MIdwest 75th Anniversary Box.jpg[edit]

Image:Frango MIdwest 75th Anniversary Box.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Frango Midwest Mint Chocolate Tin Case.jpg[edit]

Image:Frango Midwest Mint Chocolate Tin Case.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frangoboxes.JPG Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Frangoboxes.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has a logo, but could use a picture[edit]

The article has a logo, but a picture would be nice. I think a picture of the product, without any copyrighted portion of a box or container showing, would be appropriate. Peaceray (talk) 01:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Frango. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Frango. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dhocolate[edit]

How 2600:387:F:4214:0:0:0:7 (talk) 23:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]