Talk:For the Glory
Good work! Definitely a C-class article now. Usually when I post an assessment I give a mini-review of the article with some points for improvement, but all I can really say with this article is that you just need to keep expanding in each area where appropriate.
The gameplay section looks pretty much finished, although I'd suggest mentioning the setting of the game here (basic rule is any info in the lead section should be somewhere else in the article). If the game's appearance is radically different from that in the preview image I'd suggest getting a new screenshot. I'd also suggest trimming some of the sentences of excessive words, e.g. However, multiplayer stability issues, laborious management, and irritating sound effects soured opinions. can just be The game was criticized for its multiplayer stability issues, laborious management, and irritating sound effects; For example, the previously mentioned AGCEEP modification doesn't need the "For example".
Otherwise, look at other featured/good video game articles (bottom of WP:VG) to get an idea of what to do. If you have any questions, go ahead and ask. Hope this helps, Una LagunaTalk 10:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on For the Glory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100205075155/http://www.gamersdailynews.com/article-2314-For-the-Glory-Review-PC.html to http://www.gamersdailynews.com/article-2314-For-the-Glory-Review-PC.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)