Talk:Flash lag illusion

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neural Lag[edit]

( image for actual brain stimuli. I believe that the actual term for this phenomenon is 'neural lag.' Should an article be created with this name? Kniesten (talk) 23:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flash ahead of or behind moving object?[edit]

The intro says: " a flash and a moving object that appear in the same location are perceived to be displaced from one another". The rest of the article goes on to describe hypotheses to explain the illusion, involving various lags. But the article doesn't tell the critical detail of whether, in the illusion, the flash appears ahead of or behind the moving object. Gwideman (talk) 20:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Demonstration Please[edit]

I agree with the template. I don't know that I grasp what this illusion supposedly is. I feel that I would benefit from a demonstration video, or something similar. 76.103.93.154 (talk) 19:28, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added an animated gif, hope this helps! LaurentPerrinet (talk) 21:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The references from the 'Other references' tab should be be merged with the 'References' tab and the other 'References' tab should be removed[edit]

In my opinion, the references from the 'Other references' tab should be transferred to the main 'References' tab and the tab called 'Other references' should be removed in my opinion as in my opinion it looks strange having 2 reference tabs within the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]