Talk:Fix You/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Well written, follows Manual of Style.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Source number one doesn't cite anything about Muse, their song, or album. Source number two doesn't have any content. Source number three doesn't cite anything, and in reality isn't needed. Source number four doesn't cite that Gwyneth Paltrow suffered from depression. Under 'Music and lyrics', second paragraph, everything sourced solely with source number twelve is just a link to the lyrics, and the allusions seem to be original research. Under 'Release', it says the song charted on the Billboard Hot Adult Top 40 Tracks, but the source doesn't indicate that. Source twenty-nine, IMDb, is not a reliable source. Under 'Charts', the charting information isn't sourced.

   Done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Stays focused.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Under 'Music and lyrics', first paragraph, last sentence: infectious drums. This either needs to be quoted or reworded.

   Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

   Article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All good.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am placing the article on hold for seven days to allow for the above concerns to be addressed. DiverseMentality 21:31, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

   All concerns have been addressed, I'm passing the article. Good work! DiverseMentality 23:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)