Talk:FinePix S5 Pro

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Battery information is not correct.[edit]

The S5 cannot use the same batteries as those for the Nikon D200. I'm modifying the battery information, and making a note.

- Razor

Resolution information incorrect.[edit]

I'm also editing the resolution specs, which appear to have been accidentally copied from the Nikon D200 specs.

- Razor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.155.106 (talk) 04:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information regarding UV/IR version of camera[edit]

Nothing else to say =P

- Razor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.155.106 (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Modified sensor information[edit]

Fixed another copy-and-paste from the D200 article. When I have enough time I may just rewrite the whole thing =P

- Razor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.155.106 (talk) 16:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Modified Battery Information[edit]

Found a rather unprofessional addition to the battery section, which I have removed. The text, quite frankly, had nothing to do with the S5's battery system and was rank of opinion.

- Razor

Edited External Links[edit]

Removed outdated blog review and added official link from Fujifilm Global. Added additional review and specs from dpreview.com.

- Razor

Added See Also Section[edit]

See above ;)

- Razor

But apart from that, it's pretty slick, eh? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]