Talk:FilmAffinity

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Popularity[edit]

They are popular [] according to the Nielsen Ratings? I don't understand. Nielsen Ratings are for TV, as far as I know. Ben ^T/_C 03:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hai sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.101.67.39 (talk) 10:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FilmAffinity → Filmaffinity – Filmaffinity is correct. See picture. Thanks.--777sms (talk) 23:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FilmAffinity sure, Film Affinity equally OK, Filmaffinity is not a word and is obvious MOS:TM.--Labattblueboy (talk) 00:42, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Filmaffinity" is better than "FilmAffinity" per the old CamelCase guidelines (which were changed to allow camelcasing) -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Film Affinity might be better. The use of differing colors for the two words in the logo implies separate words, and most variants seem awkward. These are not individual syllables being used to create a compound. It is desirable to avoid purely stylistic formatting used for decorative purposes to create a distinct logo, per MOS:TM. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

FilmAffinity[edit]

Is film affinity a reliable or reputable source for edits on Wikipedia. B.R. Esquivel 06:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BEBO1986 (talk • contribs)