Talk:Fatel Razack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spelling in the original?[edit]

The name looks like Arabic (probably via Urdu).

How is it spelled in Arabic and/or Devanagari? -- pne (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

فتح الرزّاق / फ़त्ह अल्रज़्ज़ाक़ perhaps? -- pne (talk) 12:46, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not the Cecrops?[edit]

According to Dr. Dennison Moore, the Fatel Razack that brought the Indians to Trinidad was not the Cecrops built in 1845 and eventually owned by Ibrahim ben Youssef.

The Cecrops was built in Aabenraa (not "Aprenade") for the Danish merchant Jorgen Bruun and operated by Danish crews between Denmark and the Arabian Sea from 1845 to 1861. After it lost its rigging in a storm, it was sold to Ibrahim ben Youssef, and only then, in 1863, did it get registered as the Futtel Razac.

The Trinidad ship, by contrast, was owned by a Kolkata merchant named Abdool Rozack Dugman and turns up in official listings and signal codes as the Fatel Rozack in 1852, 1854, and 1857. The name of the ship was never given as Fath al Razaq or the like.Hieronymus Illinensis (talk) 05:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fatel Razack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]