Talk:Farasan Islands

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Saudi Arabia Mid‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Arabian Gazelle[edit]

The Arabian_Gazelle article indicated that the animal is extinct, however this Farasan Islands page indicates that the animal is merely endangered. Chris Granger 05:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No the home page says the Arabian gazelle is extinct but another species is endangered on the island. Enlil Ninlil 19:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gazella gazella farasani aka Farasani Gazelle is the currant occupants, and Gazella arabica is the extinct species as confirmed by specialists. Enlil Ninlil 19:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has some issues: Bad English and advertisement[edit]

This page is obviously aiming for tourists. The sections "Where to stay" and "Itenerary" should be made candidates for removal, whereas "How to get there" and "What to do" should either be removed or rewritten and integrated differently. The reference to booking.com is the most blatant testimony of this article's purpose. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest Aleneen (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the itinerary section, which had no place on the site, but the other sections have a mix of good and irrelevant information, most of which needs formatting work. For this reason I threw up a cleanup tag. MrEdTheTalkingHorseEditor (talk) 00:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]