Talk:FN Four

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First production inline-4?[edit]

This blog [23], which appears to be well sourced, suggests that the 1903 Evart-Hall was the first inline-4. We should be careful with wording on the FN Four. I'm not even sure now that it was the first mass produced inline-4. — Brianhe (talk) 19:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Setright (p. 38) says " A Nottingham man named Binks produced a 5.h.p. inline four in 1903, though it did not go into production. By contrast, the 363 c.c. FN of 1905...was an overwhelming success." Cyril Ayton's History of Motorcycling p. 52 says "Unlike the British Holden, Binks and Evar-Hall fours, which failed to live up to expectations, the FN Four was a great success." I'd say it was the first production inline 4. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We should still share everything we know about the other fours in this article. It's also odd that every single source goes out of their way to mention how slow the FN Four was, but they don't say which other bike you could have had prior to 1912 that was faster. Also the start date for the FN Four looks like it should be 1905, not 1911 on List of fastest production motorcycles. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brown's Ultimate History of Fast Bikes pp 12-13 says the 40mph top speed was achieved on the 1911 491cc, two-speed model, and agrees with others that a two speed was introduced in 1908; not as an aftermarket kit. Ayton, p 52, says the 1905 was capable of 40mph. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transmission contradiction[edit]

Perhaps Vintagent has a clue as to the 1908-1909 contradiction on when the two-speed transmission was available. He says the 1908 item was an aftermarket kit. — Brianhe (talk) 20:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found numerous ads in the Motorcycle Illustrated that tout all the features of the 190812 FN Big Four, as the US version was called, which mention the engine, the shaft drive, the stronger rims and tires, and the magneto, but don't say a word about a 2 speed. Then an announcement appears for the 1909 model listing the following upgrades over the 190812 model:
  • new drum brake
  • exhaust valve lift moved from right to left
  • hand brake moved to right
  • lighter pistons
  • larger rims and tires (presumably even larger than the 190812)
  • "two-speed sliding gear transmission is furnished as an extra"
So I'm satisfied that the 2 speed option existed in 1908 or 1909 -- probably earlier in Europe, then following in the US. I would guess that by 1911 2 speed was standard. None of this precludes the existence of an aftermarket 2 speed kit on the market for the older FN Fours, or those that didn't get the factory option. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good find, see the updated citation in draft article. — Brianhe (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Horstmann transmission[edit]

Hodgdon p. 24 shows a diagram of the aftermarket two-speed transmission created by "Sydney Horstmann of England". I suspect this might actually be Sidney Horstmann who later created the Horstmann bogie used on many 20th century tanks. — Brianhe (talk) 23:34, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FN Timeline[edit]

There is a FN timeline found at nl:FN (motorfiets). I have translated part of it here: Talk:FN Four/Timeline. — Brianhe (talk) 21:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FN Four. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]