Talk:FC United Zürich

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Ronaldo, whom United Zürich attempted to sign

... that FC United Zürich attempted to sign Ronaldo (pictured) after gaining promotion in 2016?

Created by REDMAN 2019 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

... that FC United Zürich was originally named FC Fenerbahce Zürich after Turkish club Fenerbahçe S.K.? Source: FC United Zürich

Several issues here. Date and length OK. But the original hook claim isn't in the article (linked with signing is not the same as attempting to sign). Also you need to get rid of that stub tag and fix the citations. QPQ is not needed as @REDMAN 2019: only has 1 credit. The picture is licenced but is not in the article so can't be used. Ping me when you've sorted it and I will have another look. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The C of E: after looking over the article, I don't think I can meet the requirements in a reasonable amount of time so I am withdrawing this nomination. Feel free to mark it as failed or whatever usually happens in this type of situation. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish. If someone else comes along before this is closed and wishes to adopt it, I will be happy to check it again. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]